— Let f and g be non-zero elements of A[X]. Let a∈A, and let the orders of a relative to f and g be p and q respectively. (i) The order of a relative to f+g is ≥inf(p,q). It is equal to inf(p,q) if p=q. (ii) The order of a relative to fg is ≥p+q. It is equal to p+q if A is an integral domain.
For we have f(X)=(X−α)pf1(X), g(X)=(X−α)qg1(X) with f1(α)=0, g1(a)=0. Suppose for example that p≤q; then we have
f(X)+g(X)=(X−α)p(f1(X)+(X−α)q−pg1(X)).
and if p<q, a is not a root of f1(X)+(X−α)q−pg1(X); this proves (i). On the other hand, we have f(X)g(X)=(X−α)p+qf1(X)g1(X) and f1(α)g1(α)=0 if A is an integral domain; this proves (ii).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.