Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 06AV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06AV].

Algebra, IV, p. 16, § 2. Zeros of polynomials

Suppose that AA is an integral domain. Let ff be a non-zero element of A[X]A[X], and α1,…,αp\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_p pairwise distinct roots of ff in AA, of orders k1,…,krk_1, \ldots, k_r. We have

f(X)=(X−α1)k1(X−α2)k2…(X−αp)kpg(X) f(X) = (X - \alpha_1)^{k_1}(X - \alpha_2)^{k_2} \ldots (X - \alpha_p)^{k_p} g(X)

where g∈A[X]g \in A[X] and α1,…,αp\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_p are not roots of gg.

We proceed by induction on pp, the proposition being evident for p=1p = 1, by Def. 1. Suppose then that f(X)=g1(X)g2(X)f(X) = g_1(X)g_2(X), where

g1(X)=(X−α1)k1…(X−αp−1)kp−1,g2(X)∈A[X]. g_1(X) = (X - \alpha_1)^{k_1} \ldots (X - \alpha_{p-1})^{k_{p-1}}, \quad g_2(X) \in A[X].

Since AA is an integral domain and αp\alpha_p is distinct from α1,…,αp−1\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_{p-1} it follows that αp\alpha_p is not a root of g1(X)g_1(X), hence αp\alpha_p is a root of order kpk_p of g2(X)g_2(X) (Prop. 4, (ii)). It follows that g2(X)g_2(X) is divisible by (X−αp)kp(X - \alpha_p)^{k_p}, and so

f(X)=(X−α1)k1…(X−αp)kpg(X) f(X) = (X - \alpha_1)^{k_1} \ldots (X - \alpha_p)^{k_p} g(X)

where g(X)∈A[X]g(X) \in A[X]. Clearly α1,…,αp\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_p are not roots of gg.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.