Let m≥1. There exists a unique polynomial A∈Z[A1,…,Am] with the following property : for any commutative ring A and monic polynomial f=Xm+∑i=1maiXm−i in A[X] we have
dis(f)=Δ(a1,…,am). Moreover A is of degree
≤2m−2 and if we assign weight i to
Ai then A is isobaric of weight
m(m−1). a) Uniqueness of A : if A satisfies (48), we have in particular
A=dis(F), where F is the polynomial
Xm+∑i=1mAiXm−i with coefficients in
Z[A1,…,Am]. b) Existence
of A : let
s1,…,sm be the elementary symmetric polynomials in the indeterminates
X1,…,Xm. There exists a polynomial
A∈Z[A1,…,Am], isobaric of weight
m(m−1), such that
Δ(−s1,s2,…,(−1)msm)=i<j∏(Xi−Xj)2;
for the right-hand side is a symmetric polynomial P, homogeneous of degree m(m − 1) in Z[X1,...,Xm] (IV, p. 62, Th. 1). Now formula (46) means that dis(f) = P (f ), in the notation of IV, p. 74, and (48) follows directly from this.
c) Degree of A : the relation (47) and the definition of the resultant (IV, p. 76) imply the formula
(−1)m(m−1)/2Δ=det(aij)0≤i,j≤2m−2
with the following values of the aij
a00aijaij=1,a0,m−1=m,=Ai−j=(j−i+1)Am+i−j−1for 1≤i≤2m−2,0≤j≤m−2for 1≤i≤2m−2,m−1≤j≤2m−2.
a0j=0 if j=0, j=m−1
In these formulae it is understood that Ai=1 and Ai=0 for i<0 or i>m. Now (50) shows at once that A is of degree ≤2m−2, as we had to prove.
Prop. 10 allows us to extend the definition of the discriminant to non-monic polynomials. Let m≥1 be an integer, then there exists a unique homogeneous polynomial of degree 2m−2, Δ~ say, in Z[A0,A1,...,Am] such that
Δ(A1,...,Ar)=Δ~(1,A1,...,Ar)
for, since A is of degree ≤2m−2, the rational fraction
A02m−2Δ(A1/A0,...,Am/A0)
belongs to the subring Z[A0,A1,...,Am] of Q(A0,A1,...,Am). If Ai has weight i for 0≤i≤m, then Δ~ is isobaric of weight m(m−1). Iff is a polynomial of degree ≤m, say
f=a0Xm+a1Xm−1+⋯+am−1X+am,
we shall put
dism(f)=Δ~(a0,a1,...,ar).
When m=degf, we shall simply write dis(f) for dism(f); if f is monic, dis(f) agrees with the discriminant defined in Def. 2, by (48), (51) and (52).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.