Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 06OY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06OY].

Algebra, chapter V, § 11. Abelian extensions

Let Γ\Gamma be a cyclic group of order nn, σ\sigma a generator of Γ\Gamma and M a commutative group on which Γ\Gamma operates according to the rule γ.(m+m′)=γ.m+γ.m′\gamma . (m + m') = \gamma . m + \gamma . m' for all γ∈Γ\gamma \in \Gamma and m,m′∈Mm, m' \in M. Let Z be the set of all mappings of Γ\Gamma into M satisfying the relation

f(ττ′)=f(τ)+τ.f(τ′)for τ,τ′ in Γ f(\tau \tau') = f(\tau) + \tau . f(\tau') \quad \text{for } \tau, \tau' \text{ in } \Gamma

Put u(f)=f(a)u(f) = f(a) for f∈Zf \in Z and t(m)=∑τ∈Γτ.mt(m) = \sum_{\tau \in \Gamma} \tau . m for m∈Mm \in M. Then the sequence

0→Z→uM→tM 0 \to Z \xrightarrow{u} M \xrightarrow{t} M

is exact.

Let f∈Zf \in \mathbf{Z}; taking τ=τ′=1\tau = \tau' = 1 in (10) we find that f(1)=0f(1) = 0. Further, by induction on m⩾0m \geqslant 0 we deduce the relation

f(σm)=f(σ)+σ⋅f(σ)+⋯+σm−2⋅f(σ)+σm−1⋅f(σ) f(\sigma^m) = f(\sigma) + \sigma \cdot f(\sigma) + \cdots + \sigma^{m-2} \cdot f(\sigma) + \sigma^{m-1} \cdot f(\sigma)

We have σn=1\sigma^n = 1, whence f(σn)=0f(\sigma^n) = 0; the preceding relation with m=nm = n is equivalent to the equality t(u(f))=0t(u(f)) = 0, whence Im⁡ u⊂Ker⁡ t\operatorname{Im}\ u \subset \operatorname{Ker}\ t. Moreover, from (11) it follows that Ker⁡ u=0\operatorname{Ker}\ u = 0.

Let m∈Mm \in M be such that t(m)=0t(m) = 0, that is, m+σ⋅m+⋯+σn−1⋅m=0m + \sigma \cdot m + \cdots + \sigma^{n-1} \cdot m = 0. Let us define the mapping ff of Γ\Gamma into MM by

f(σj)=m+σ⋅m+⋯+σj−2⋅m+σj−1⋅m f(\sigma^j) = m + \sigma \cdot m + \cdots + \sigma^{j-2} \cdot m + \sigma^{j-1} \cdot m

for 0⩽j⩽n−10 \leqslant j \leqslant n - 1. It may be left to the reader to establish the relation (10). We clearly have m=f(a)m = f(a), whence Im⁡ u⊃Ker⁡ t\operatorname{Im}\ u \supset \operatorname{Ker}\ t.

With the lemma now proved, let us take y∈E∗y \in E^* and x=y/σ(y)x = y/\sigma(y); we have NE/K(σ(y))=NE/K(y)N_{E/K}(\sigma(y)) = N_{E/K}(y), whence NE/K(x)=1N_{E/K}(x) = 1. Conversely, let xx in E∗E^* be such that NE/K(x)=1N_{E/K}(x) = 1; by Lemma 4, applied to M=E∗M = E^*, there exists a family of elements (cτ)τ∈Γ(c_\tau)_{\tau \in \Gamma} of E∗E^* satisfying the relation cττ′=cτ⋅τ(cτ′)c_{\tau \tau'} = c_\tau \cdot \tau(c_{\tau'}) for τ,τ′\tau, \tau' in Γ\Gamma and cσ=xc_\sigma = x. By Cor. 1 of Prop. 9 (V, p. 65) there exists y∈E∗y \in E^* with cτ=y/τ(y)c_\tau = y/\tau(y) for all τ∈Γ\tau \in \Gamma, whence in particular x=cσ=y/σ(y)x = c_\sigma = y/\sigma(y). If y1∈E∗y_1 \in E^* satisfies x=y1/σ(y1)x = y_1/\sigma(y_1), then we have

σ(y1y−1)=y1y−1, \sigma(y_1 y^{-1}) = y_1 y^{-1},

hence y1y−1y_1 y^{-1} belongs to K∗K^* because aa generates the Galois group of EE over KK. This proves a).

The assertion b) follows in similar fashion from Cor. 2 of Prop. 9 (V, p. 65).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.