Let Γ be a cyclic group of order n, σ a generator of Γ and M a commutative group on which Γ operates according to the rule γ.(m+m′)=γ.m+γ.m′ for all γ∈Γ and m,m′∈M. Let Z be the set of all mappings of Γ into M satisfying the relation
f(ττ′)=f(τ)+τ.f(τ′)for τ,τ′ in Γ
Put u(f)=f(a) for f∈Z and t(m)=∑τ∈Γτ.m for m∈M. Then the sequence
0→ZuMtM
is exact.
Let f∈Z; taking τ=τ′=1 in (10) we find that f(1)=0. Further, by induction on m⩾0 we deduce the relation
f(σm)=f(σ)+σ⋅f(σ)+⋯+σm−2⋅f(σ)+σm−1⋅f(σ)
We have σn=1, whence f(σn)=0; the preceding relation with m=n is equivalent to the equality t(u(f))=0, whence Imu⊂Kert. Moreover, from (11) it follows that Keru=0.
Let m∈M be such that t(m)=0, that is, m+σ⋅m+⋯+σn−1⋅m=0. Let us define the mapping f of Γ into M by
f(σj)=m+σ⋅m+⋯+σj−2⋅m+σj−1⋅m
for 0⩽j⩽n−1. It may be left to the reader to establish the relation (10). We clearly have m=f(a), whence Imu⊃Kert.
With the lemma now proved, let us take y∈E∗ and x=y/σ(y); we have NE/K(σ(y))=NE/K(y), whence NE/K(x)=1. Conversely, let x in E∗ be such that NE/K(x)=1; by Lemma 4, applied to M=E∗, there exists a family of elements (cτ)τ∈Γ of E∗ satisfying the relation cττ′=cτ⋅τ(cτ′) for τ,τ′ in Γ and cσ=x. By Cor. 1 of Prop. 9 (V, p. 65) there exists y∈E∗ with cτ=y/τ(y) for all τ∈Γ, whence in particular x=cσ=y/σ(y). If y1∈E∗ satisfies x=y1/σ(y1), then we have
σ(y1y−1)=y1y−1,
hence y1y−1 belongs to K∗ because a generates the Galois group of E over K. This proves a).
The assertion b) follows in similar fashion from Cor. 2 of Prop. 9 (V, p. 65).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.