Bourbaki

Proposition 12

Tag 06SM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06SM].

Algebra, chapter V, § 14. Transcendental extensions

— Let L be an extension of a field K and E, F subextensions of L. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

a) E and F are algebraically disjoint;

b) there exists a transcendence basis of E over K which is algebraically free over F;

c) every subset of E which is algebraically free over K is algebraically free over F.

Let us introduce the following conditions:

b′b'') there exists a transcendence basis of F over K which is algebraically free over E;

c′c'') every subset of F which is algebraically free over K is algebraically free over E.

a)⇒b′a) \Rightarrow b'') : Suppose that E and F are algebraically disjoint. Let B (resp. C) be a transcendence basis of E (resp. FF) over K. Then B∩C=∅B \cap C = \varnothing and B∪CB \cup C is algebraically free over K, hence C is algebraically free over K(B)K(B) (V, p. 107, Prop. 4); since E is algebraic over K(B)K(B), Prop. 6 of V, p. 108 shows C to be algebraically free over E.

b′b'') ⇒\Rightarrow c) : Suppose that there exists a transcendence basis C of F over K which is algebraically free over E. Let A be a subset of E algebraically free over K. Then C is algebraically free over K(A)K(A), hence A is algebraically free over K(C)K(C) (V, p. 107, Prop. 4) and therefore over FF (V, p. 108, Prop. 6), because F is algebraic over K(C)K(C).

c) ⇒\Rightarrow a) : This follows at once from Prop. 4 (V, p. 107).

The implications a)⇒b)⇒c′)⇒a)a) \Rightarrow b) \Rightarrow c' ) \Rightarrow a) may be proved in the same way.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.