Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 06RV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06RV].

Algebra, chapter V, § 14. Transcendental extensions

— Let E be an extension of a field K and S and T two subsets of E. Then the following properties are equivalent: a) S∪TS \cup T is algebraically free over K and S∩T=∅S \cap T = \varnothing.

b) SS is algebraically free over KK and TT is algebraically free over K(S)K(S). c) TT is algebraically free over KK and SS is algebraically free over K(T)K(T).

Evidently it is enough to prove that a) and b) are equivalent.

a)⇒b)a) \Rightarrow b): Suppose that a) holds. Since SS is contained in S∪TS \cup T, it is algebraically free over KK. If TT is not algebraically free over K(S)K(S), there exists (Prop. 3) a finite family (yj)1≤j≤n(y_j)_{1 \leq j \leq n} of distinct elements of TT which is algebraically related over K(S)K(S). Hence there is a non-zero polynomial ff in the ring K(S)[Y1,...,Yn]K(S)[Y_1, ..., Y_n] such that f(y1,...,yn)=0f(y_1, ..., y_n) = 0; after multiplying ff if necessary by a non-zero element of K[S]K[S] we may suppose that all the coefficients off belong to K[S]K[S]. The coefficients of fare polynomials in a finite number of distinct elements xi (1≤i≤m)x_i \ (1 \leq i \leq m ) of SS, with coefficients in KK. The elements x1,...,xm,y1,...,ynx_1, ..., x_m, y_1, ..., y_n are pairwise distinct because S∩T=(21S \cap T = (21. The relation f(y1,...,yn)=0f(y_1, ..., y_n) = 0 may thus be written

g(x1,...,xm;y1,...,yn)=0, g(x_1, ..., x_m ; y_1, ..., y_n) = 0 ,

where gg is a non-zero polynomial of K[X1,...,Xm,Y1,...,Yn]K[X_1, ..., X_m, Y_1, ..., Y_n], and such a relation contradicts the hypothesis that S∪TS \cup T is algebraically free.

b)⇒a)b) \Rightarrow a): Suppose that b) holds. In the first place it is clear that T∩K(S)=∅T \cap K(S) = \varnothing and afortiori S∩T=(21a fortiori \ S \cap T = (21. It suffices to show that if xi (1≤i≤m)x_i \ (1 \leq i \leq m ) are distinct elements of SS, finite in number, and yj (1≤j≤n)y_j \ (1 \leq j \leq n ) distinct elements of TT finite in number, then the set of the xix_i and yjy_j is algebraically free over KK (Prop. 3). Consider a polynomial f∈K[X1,...,Xm,Y1,...,Yn]f \in K[X_1, ..., X_m, Y_1, ..., Y_n] such that f(x1,...,xm,y1,...,yn)=0f(x_1, ..., x_m, y_1, ..., y_n) = 0 and put f=∑φαY1α1...Ynαnf = \sum \varphi_\alpha Y_1^{\alpha_1} ... Y_n^{\alpha_n} with φα∈K[X1,...,Xm]\varphi_\alpha \in K[X_1, ..., X_m] for all α=(α1,...,αn)∈Nn\alpha = (\alpha_1, ..., \alpha_n) \in \mathbf{N}^n. Let g=f(x1,...,xm,Y1,...,Yn)g = f(x_1, ..., x_m, Y_1, ..., Y_n); then gg is a polynomial in the ring K[S][Y1,...,Yn]K[S][Y_1, ..., Y_n] and the relation f(x1,...,xm,y1,...,yn)=0f(x_1, ..., x_m, y_1, ..., y_n) = 0 may be written g(y1,...,yn)=0g(y_1, ..., y_n) = 0. Since TT is algebraically free over K(S)K(S), each of the coefficients φα(x1,...,xm)\varphi_\alpha(x_1, ..., x_m) of gg is zero; since SS is algebraically free over KK, we have φα=0\varphi_\alpha = 0 for all α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n, and hence f=0f = 0.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.