— a) For each element x of a lattice ordered group G we have x=x+−x− and inf(x+,x−)=0.
b) For every expression of x as the difference of two positive elements, say x=u−v, we have u=x++w and v=x−+w with w=inf(u,v). In particular if inf(u,v)=0 then u=x+ and v=x−.
c) The relation « x≤y » is equivalent to « x+≤y+ and x−≥y− ».
d) We have ∣x∣=x++x−≥0.
e) For any x and y in G, we have the inequality ∣x+y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣, and more generally ∣∑i=1nxi∣≤∑i=1n∣xi∣ for any finite family (xi) of elements of G.
f) For any x and y in G we have ∣∣x∣−∣y∣∣≤∣x−y∣.
We will prove a) and b) simultaneously. If x=u−v with u and v positive, then u a x, so u≥sup(x,0)=x+, and w=u−x+ is positive. On the other hand we have
x+−x=sup(x,0)−x=sup(x−x,−x)=x
from which it follows that x=x+−x−, and v−x−=w. If z≤x− then z≤x+−x, and so x≤x+−z; if also z≤x+, then xz−z is positive, and so xi≤x+−z by definition of xi. Hence we have z≤0, which implies inf(x+,x−)=0, whence by translation inf(u,v)=w.
c) The relation x≤y implies sup(y,0)≥x and sup(y,0)≥0, hence xi≤yi; similarly if −y≤−x we deduce x−≥y−. The converse implication follows immediately from x=x+−x and y=y+−y.
d) Since x≤x+ and −x≤x−, it is clear that
∣x∣=sup(x,−x)≤x++x Conversely, if
a≥x and
a≥−x then we deduce from c) that
a+≥x+,
a+≥x−,
a−≤x− and
a−≤x+; since
a− is positive and
inf(xi,x−)=0, the last two inequalities imply
a−=0 and
a=a+; the first two inequalities then give
a≥sup(x+,x−), and
sup(x+,x−) is equal to
x++x− by a) and by Prop. 7 of VI, p. 10.
e) Since x and y s ∣x∣ and y, we have x+y≤∣x∣+∣y∣; since −x≤∣x∣ and −y≤∣y∣, we have −x−y≤∣x∣+∣y∣; whence the first inequality. The second follows by induction on n.
f) Replacing x and y by y and x - y in e), we obtain
∣x∣−∣y∣≤∣x−y∣ similarly we have
∣y∣−∣x∣≤∣y−x∣=∣x−y∣; whence the stated result.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.