Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 06X2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06X2].

Algebra, chapter VI, § 1. Ordered groups. Divisibility

— a) For each element xx of a lattice ordered group GG we have x=x+−x−x = x^+ - x^- and inf⁡(x+,x−)=0\inf(x^+, x^-) = 0.

b) For every expression of xx as the difference of two positive elements, say x=u−vx = u - v, we have u=x++wu = x^+ + w and v=x−+wv = x^- + w with w=inf⁡(u,v)w = \inf(u, v). In particular if inf⁡(u,v)=0\inf(u, v) = 0 then u=x+u = x^+ and v=x−v = x^-.

c) The relation « x≤yx \leq y » is equivalent to « x+≤y+x^+ \leq y^+ and x−≥y−x^- \geq y^- ».

d) We have ∣x∣=x++x−≥0|x| = x^+ + x^- \geq 0.

e) For any xx and yy in GG, we have the inequality ∣x+y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣|x + y| \leq |x| + |y|, and more generally ∣∑i=1nxi∣≤∑i=1n∣xi∣\left| \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right| \leq \sum_{i=1}^n |x_i| for any finite family (xi)(x_i) of elements of GG.

f) For any xx and yy in GG we have ∣∣x∣−∣y∣∣≤∣x−y∣||x| - |y|| \leq |x - y|.

We will prove a) and b) simultaneously. If x=u−vx = u - v with uu and vv positive, then uu a xx, so u≥sup⁡(x,0)=x+u \geq \sup(x, 0) = x^+, and w=u−x+w = u - x^+ is positive. On the other hand we have

x+−x=sup⁡(x,0)−x=sup⁡(x−x,−x)=x x^+ - x = \sup(x, 0) - x = \sup(x - x, -x) = x

from which it follows that x=x+−x−x = x^+ - x^-, and v−x−=wv - x^- = w. If z≤x−z \leq x^- then z≤x+−xz \leq x^+ - x, and so x≤x+−zx \leq x^+ - z; if also z≤x+z \leq x^+, then xz−zx^z - z is positive, and so xi≤x+−zx^i \leq x^+ - z by definition of xix^i. Hence we have z≤0z \leq 0, which implies inf⁡(x+,x−)=0\inf(x^+, x^-) = 0, whence by translation inf⁡(u,v)=w\inf(u, v) = w.

c) The relation x≤yx \leq y implies sup⁡(y,0)≥x\sup(y, 0) \geq x and sup⁡(y,0)≥0\sup(y, 0) \geq 0, hence xi≤yix^i \leq y^i; similarly if −y≤−x-y \leq -x we deduce x−≥y−x^- \geq y^-. The converse implication follows immediately from x=x+−xx = x^+ - x and y=y+−yy = y^+ - y.

d) Since x≤x+x \leq x^+ and −x≤x−-x \leq x^-, it is clear that

∣x∣=sup⁡(x,−x)≤x++x |x| = \sup(x, -x) \leq x^+ + x
Conversely, if a≥xa \geq x and a≥−xa \geq -x then we deduce from c) that a+≥x+a^+ \geq x^+, a+≥x−a^+ \geq x^-, a−≤x−a^- \leq x^- and a−≤x+a^- \leq x^+; since a−a^- is positive and inf⁡(xi,x−)=0\inf(x^i, x^-) = 0, the last two inequalities imply a−=0a^- = 0 and a=a+a = a^+; the first two inequalities then give a≥sup⁡(x+,x−)a \geq \sup(x^+, x^-), and sup⁡(x+,x−)\sup(x^+, x^-) is equal to x++x−x^+ + x^- by a) and by Prop. 7 of VI, p. 10.

e) Since xx and yy s ∣x∣|x| and yy, we have x+y≤∣x∣+∣y∣x + y \leq |x| + |y|; since −x≤∣x∣-x \leq |x| and −y≤∣y∣-y \leq |y|, we have −x−y≤∣x∣+∣y∣-x - y \leq |x| + |y|; whence the first inequality. The second follows by induction on n.

f) Replacing x and y by y and x - y in e), we obtain

∣x∣−∣y∣≤∣x−y∣ |x| - |y| \leq |x - y|
similarly we have ∣y∣−∣x∣≤∣y−x∣=∣x−y∣|y| - |x| \leq |y - x| = |x - y|; whence the stated result.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.