whence (AP_{II}). Finally, let us check (AP_{III}): suppose given an identity of the form p−xq=−(r−xs) where p,q,r,s belong to P; we deduce from this the relation x(s+q)=p+r; if s+q=0 we have
x=(s+q)−2(s+q)(p+r)∈CPP⊂P,
contrary to the hypothesis; hence s+q=0, whence p+r=0; since P satisfies (AP_{III}) we deduce that s=q=r=p=0, which completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.