Bourbaki

Lemma

Tag 06Z8, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06Z8].

Algebra, chapter VI, § 2. Ordered fields

— Let P∈MP \in \mathscr{M} and x∉Px \notin P; then there exists P′∈MP' \in \mathscr{M} such that P⊂P′P \subset P' and −x∈P′-x \in P'.

Take P′=P−xPP' = P - xP, and check that P′P' has the required properties. Since 0∈C⊂P0 \in C \subset P, we have P⊂P′P \subset P'. Whence C⊂P′C \subset P' and K+⊂P′K_+ \subset P'. Since 1∈C⊂P1 \in C \subset P we have −x∈P′-x \in P'. We have

P′+P′=P−xP+P−xP=P+P−x(P+P)⊂P−xP=P′, P' + P' = P - xP + P - xP = P + P - x(P + P) \subset P - xP = P',
whence (AP_I). We have
P′P′=(P−xP)(P−xP)⊂⊂PP+x2PP−x(PP+PP)⊂P+CP−xP⊂P−xP=P′, P'P' = (P - xP)(P - xP) \subset \\ \quad \subset PP + x^2PP - x(PP + PP) \subset P + CP - xP \subset P - xP = P',
whence (AP_{II}). Finally, let us check (AP_{III}): suppose given an identity of the form p−xq=−(r−xs)p - xq = -(r - xs) where p,q,r,sp, q, r, s belong to P; we deduce from this the relation x(s+q)=p+rx(s + q) = p + r; if s+q≠0s + q \neq 0 we have
x=(s+q)−2(s+q)(p+r)∈CPP⊂P, x = (s + q)^{-2}(s + q)(p + r) \in CPP \subset P,
contrary to the hypothesis; hence s+q=0s + q = 0, whence p+r=0p + r = 0; since P satisfies (AP_{III}) we deduce that s=q=r=p=0s = q = r = p = 0, which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.