Theorem 2
Tag 072K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 072K].
Algebra, VII, p. 10, § 2. Torsion modules over a principal ideal domain
Let be a principal ideal domain, let be its field offructions and let be a system of representatives of irreducible elements of . Given an element , there exist a finite subset of , elements and not divisible by in (), and integers () such that
where and the are uniquely determined by these conditions.
Moreover, if denotes a subset of containing precisely one element of each residue class mod in , then each can be uniquely expressed in the form
where and for all and , and all but finitely many of the are zero.
Consider as an -module; then is the submodule generated by 1. The quotient module is the quotient of by the equivalence relation , which is also written, in the notation of VI, p. 6, as (mod 1); let denote the natural homomorphism from onto .
The quotient module is a torsion module, for every element of has the form (), whence . Hence Th. 1 of VII, p. 8 applies. Let () be the submodule of elements of annihilated by powers of ; then is the subring of elements of of the form where and is an integer. The module is the direct sum of the , so every is congruent mod 1 to an element in the sum of the ; in other words, formula (1) holds, with the integers , and the , finitely many elements of such that , is not a multiple of .
We now show that these conditions on the and the , completely determine and the . Indeed is then the set of such that the component of in is . On the other hand if and are two integers such that s \geq s' and if and are elements of not divisible by such that , then we deduce that ; if then , contradicting the hypotheses. This argument also shows that each is well defined mod .
To complete the proof, we note first of all that in each residue class mod in there exists a unique element of the form with for . In fact, we proceed by induction on (the property follows from the definition of for ) : let ; by hypothesis there is a unique element of the form () in the residue class of mod ; then is a multiple of ; now there exists a unique element , of such that ; whence . To obtain formula (2) it is now enough to apply this fact to each in formula (1). The uniqueness is clear in view of the above.
The following are the most important applications of Th. 2 :
I. The ring A is the ring Z of rational integers, and K = Q. Let P be the set of prime numbers > 0, and for each let be the interval in . Thus we have the canonical decomposition
with , and .
II. The ring A is the ring E[X] of polynomials in one indeterminate over a commutative field E, and K = E(X). Let P be the set of monic irreducible polynomials in (VII, p. 5). For we can, by virtue of euclidean division of polynomials (IV, p. 10), take to be the set of polynomials of degree strictly less than that of . Thus we have the decomposition (called canonical) of a rational function :
where is a polynomial and is a polynomial of degree strictly less than that of , for all and . In particular, if the field E is algebraically closed, then the have the form with , and the are thus constants.
Hence we can say that the vector space over the field E has a basis consisting of the monomials ( an integer) and the rational functions of the form , where and and are integers with and .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.