Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 072K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 072K].

Algebra, VII, p. 10, § 2. Torsion modules over a principal ideal domain

Let AA be a principal ideal domain, let KK be its field offructions and let PP be a system of representatives of irreducible elements of AA. Given an element x∈Kx \in K, there exist a finite subset HH of PP, elements a0∈Aa_0 \in A and a,∈Aa, \in A not divisible by pp in AA (p∈Hp \in H), and integers s(p)>0s(p) > 0 (p∈Hp \in H) such that

x=a0+∑p∈Happ−s(p), x = a_0 + \sum_{p \in H} a_p p^{-s(p)},

where HH and the s(p)s(p) are uniquely determined by these conditions.

Moreover, if RpR_p denotes a subset of AA containing precisely one element of each residue class mod pp in A(p∈P)A (p \in P), then each x∈Kx \in K can be uniquely expressed in the form

x=a+∑p∈P(∑h=1∞rphp−h) x = a + \sum_{p \in P} \left( \sum_{h=1}^{\infty} r_{ph} p^{-h} \right)

where a∈Aa \in A and rph∈Rpr_{ph} \in R_p for all hh and pp, and all but finitely many of the rphr_{ph} are zero.

Consider KK as an AA-module; then AA is the submodule generated by 1. The quotient module K/AK/A is the quotient of KK by the equivalence relation x′−x∈Ax' - x \in A, which is also written, in the notation of VI, p. 6, as x≡x′x \equiv x' (mod 1); let ff denote the natural homomorphism from KK onto M=K/AM = K/A.

The quotient module MM is a torsion module, for every element of MM has the form f(a/b)f(a/b) (a∈A,b∈A,b≠0a \in A, b \in A, b \neq 0), whence bf(a/b)=f(a)=0b f(a/b) = f(a) = 0. Hence Th. 1 of VII, p. 8 applies. Let MpM_p (p∈Pp \in P) be the submodule of elements of MM annihilated by powers of pp; then f−1(Mp)f^{-1}(M_p) is the subring ApA_p of elements of KK of the form ap−na p^{-n} where a∈Aa \in A and n≥0n \geq 0 is an integer. The module MM is the direct sum of the MpM_p, so every x∈Kx \in K is congruent mod 1 to an element in the sum of the ApA_p; in other words, formula (1) holds, with the s(p)s(p) integers >0> 0, and the aa, finitely many elements of AA such that aa, is not a multiple of pp.

We now show that these conditions on the s(p)s(p) and the aa, completely determine HH and the s(p)s(p). Indeed HH is then the set of p∈Pp \in P such that the component of f(x)f(x) in MpM_p is ≠0\neq 0. On the other hand if ss and s′s' are two integers >0> 0 such that s \geq s' and if aa and a′a' are elements of AA not divisible by pp such that ap−s≡a′p−s′(mod1)ap^{-s} \equiv a'p^{-s'} \pmod{1}, then we deduce that a≡a′ps−s′(modps)a \equiv a'p^{s-s'} \pmod{p^s}; if s>s′s > s' then a≡0(modp)a \equiv 0 \pmod{p}, contradicting the hypotheses. This argument also shows that each aia_i is well defined mod ps(p)p^{s(p)}.

To complete the proof, we note first of all that in each residue class mod pip^i in AA there exists a unique element of the form ∑h=0s−1rhph\sum_{h=0}^{s-1} r_h p^h with rh∈Rpr_h \in R_p for 0≤h≤s−10 \leq h \leq s-1. In fact, we proceed by induction on ss (the property follows from the definition of RpR_p for s=1s = 1) : let x∈Ax \in A; by hypothesis there is a unique element of the form ∑h=0s−2rhph\sum_{h=0}^{s-2} r_h p^h (rh∈Rpr_h \in R_p) in the residue class of xx mod ps−1p^{s-1}; then x−∑h=0s−2rhphx - \sum_{h=0}^{s-2} r_h p^h is a multiple aps−1ap^{s-1} of ps−1p^{s-1}; now there exists a unique element rsr_s, of RpR_p such that a≡rs(modp)a \equiv r_s \pmod{p}; whence x≡∑h=0s−1rhph(modps)x \equiv \sum_{h=0}^{s-1} r_h p^h \pmod{p^s}. To obtain formula (2) it is now enough to apply this fact to each apa_p in formula (1). The uniqueness is clear in view of the above.

The following are the most important applications of Th. 2 :

I. The ring A is the ring Z of rational integers, and K = Q. Let P be the set of prime numbers > 0, and for each p∈Pp \in P let RpR_p be the interval (0,p−1)(0, p-1) in Z\mathbf{Z}. Thus we have the canonical decomposition

x=a+∑p∈P(∑h=1∞ephp−h) x = a + \sum_{p \in P} \left( \sum_{h=1}^{\infty} e_{ph} p^{-h} \right)

with a∈Za \in \mathbf{Z}, eph∈Ze_{ph} \in \mathbf{Z} and 0≤eph≤p−10 \leq e_{ph} \leq p-1.

II. The ring A is the ring E[X] of polynomials in one indeterminate over a commutative field E, and K = E(X). Let P be the set of monic irreducible polynomials in E[X]E[X] (VII, p. 5). For p∈Pp \in P we can, by virtue of euclidean division of polynomials (IV, p. 10), take RpR_p to be the set of polynomials of degree strictly less than that of pp. Thus we have the decomposition (called canonical) of a rational function r(X)∈E(X)r(X) \in E(X):

r(X)=a(X)+∑p∈P(∑h=1∞vph(X)⋅p(X)−h) r(X) = a(X) + \sum_{p \in P} \left( \sum_{h=1}^{\infty} v_{ph}(X) \cdot p(X)^{-h} \right)

where a(X)a(X) is a polynomial and vph(X)v_{ph}(X) is a polynomial of degree strictly less than that of p(X)p(X), for all pp and hh. In particular, if the field E is algebraically closed, then the p(X)p(X) have the form X−aX - a with a∈Ea \in E, and the vph(X)v_{ph}(X) are thus constants.

Hence we can say that the vector space E(X)E(X) over the field E has a basis consisting of the monomials XnX^n (n≥0n \geq 0 an integer) and the rational functions of the form Xm/(p(X))hX^m / (p(X))^h, where p∈Pp \in P and hh and mm are integers with h≥1h \geq 1 and 0≤rn<deg⁡(p)0 \leq rn < \deg(p).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.