For i=1,2, let Ei and Fi be two Hausdorff prehilbertian spaces and let ui∈L(Ei;Fi). The linear mapping u1⊗u2 from E1⊗2E2 into F1⊗2F2 is continuous and we have
∥u1⊗u2∥=∥u1∥⋅∥u2∥.
Consider the positive hermitian form on E1 given by
f(x1,y1)=∥u1∥2⟨x1∣y1⟩−⟨u1(x1)∣u1(y1)⟩.
By prop. 1 (V, p. 25), there exists a positive hermitian form Φ on E1⊗E2 such that
Φ(x1⊗x2,y1⊗y2)=f(x1,y1)⟨x2∣y2⟩= =∥u1∥2⟨x1⊗x2∣y1⊗y2⟩−⟨(u1⊗1)(x1⊗x2)∣(u1⊗1)(y1⊗y2)⟩ for
x1,y1 in
E1 and
x2,y2 in
E2. By linearity we have
Φ(z,t)=∥u1∥2⟨z∣t⟩−⟨(u1⊗1)(z)∣(u1⊗1)(t)⟩ for
z,t in
E1⊗E2. Since
Φ is positive, we get
Φ(z,z)≥0, that is,
∥(u1⊗1).z∥2
≤∥u1∥⋅∥z∥2 for z∈E1⊗2E2, or ∥u1⊗1∥≤∥u1∥. Similarly we prove the inequality ∥1⊗u2∥≤∥u2∥, and since u1⊗u2=(u1⊗1)∘(1⊗u2), we get ∥u1⊗u2∥≤∥u1∥⋅∥u2∥. On the other hand,
∥u1∥⋅∥u2∥=∥x1∥≤1,∥x2∥≤1sup∥u1(x1)∥⋅∥u2(x2)∥ =∥x1∥≤1,∥x2∥≤1sup∥(u1⊗u2)(x1⊗x2)∥2≤∥u1⊗u2∥. This completes the proof of prop. 2. Q.E.D.
Let E1,...,En be prehilbertian spaces (n≥2). We define the tensor product E1⊗2...⊗2En (also denoted by ⨂i=1nEi) by induction, by
E1⊗2...⊗2En=(E1⊗2...⊗2En−1)⊗2En. Hence, by the definition of scalar product, we have
⟨x1⊗...⊗xn∣y1⊗...⊗yn⟩=i=1∏n⟨xi∣yi⟩, and in particular
1 ∥x1⊗...⊗xn∥2=∥x1∥⋯∥xn∥, for
xi,yi in
Ei (
1≤i≤n). If the
Ei are Hausdorff, then so is
E1⊗2...⊗2En.
Let F1,...,Fn be prehilbertian spaces and ui∈L(Ei;Fi) for 1≤i≤n. By induction on n, prop. 2 implies that u1⊗...⊗un is a continuous linear mapping from E1⊗2...⊗2En into F1⊗2...⊗2Fn and that
∥u1⊗...⊗un∥=∥u1∥⋯∥un∥. Let
σ∈Sn be a permutation of the set
{1,2,...,n}. Because of (6), the linear mapping
pσ from
E1⊗2...⊗2En onto
Eσ−1(1)⊗2...⊗2Eσ−1(n) characterized by
pσ(x1⊗...⊗xn)=xσ−1(1)⊗...⊗xσ−1(n) is a prehilbertian space isomorphism ("commutativity of tensor product").
Similarly, consider a partition of {1,2,...,n} into m consecutive intervals I1,...,In with Ik=[ak,ak+1−1] for 1≤k≤m. Put
Fk=i=ak⨂ak+1−1Ei(1≤k≤m).
1 Here again we put ∥z∥2=⟨z∣z⟩1/2 for z in E1⊗2...⊗2En.
The canonical isomorphism from F1⊗...⊗Fm onto E1⊗...⊗En which transforms ⨂k=1m⨂i=akak+1−1xi into x1⊗...⊗xn (A, II, § 3, No. 9) is a prehilbertian space isomorphism (« associativity of the tensor product »).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.