Let J0=[α,β] be a compact interval contained in I. In order that ∥∫Jf(t)dt−∫J′f(t)dt∥≤ε for every pair of compact intervals J,J′ contained in I and containing J′ it is necessary that ∥∫Kf(t)dt∥≤ε, and it suffices that ∥∫Kf(t)dt∥≤ε/2, for every compact interval K contained in I and having no interior point in common with J0.
Indeed, if for J0⊂J⊂I and J0⊂J′⊂I, one has
∫Jf(t)dt−∫J′f(t)dt≤ε
one sees in particular that, for x≤y≤α, or for β≤x≤y (x and y in I), one has ∥∫xyf(t)dt∥≤ε. Conversely, if ∥∫Kf(t)dt∥≤ε/2 for every compact interval K⊂I such that K∩J0=∅, and if J=[x,y], J′=[z,t] are two compact intervals contained in I and containing J0, one has
1 Recall (Set Theory, III, p. 144) that a set F of subsets of I is directed with respect to the relation⊂ if, for any X∈F, Y∈F, there exists Z∈F such that X⊂Z and Y⊂Z. If S(X) denotes the subset of F formed by the U∈F such that U⊃X, then the S(X) form a base for a filter on F, called the filter of sections of F; the limit (if it exists) of a map f of F into a topological space, with respect to the filter of sections of F, is called the limit of f with respect to the directed setF (cf. Gen. Top., I, p. 70 and Gen. Top., IV, p. 348).
∫Jf(t)dt−∫J′f(t)dt=∫xzf(t)dt+∫tyf(t)dt≤ε,
since
x≤α≤β≤yandz≤α≤β≤t.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.