Supposing that the hypotheses of prop. 5 are satisfied, leta(α), b(α)be two functions defined onV, with values inI; if the derivativesa′(α0),b′(α0) exist and are finite then the function g(α)=∫a(α)b(α)f(t,α)dt admits at α0 a derivative given by the formula
By prop. 5 of II, p. 74, the first integral on the right-hand side tends to ∫a(α0)b(α0)fα′(t,α0)dt as α tends to α0. In the second integral we replace f(t,α) by f(b(α0),α0) and show that the difference tends to 0. We put M=max(∥f(b(α0),α0)∥,∣b′(α0)∣+1); the function b(α) being continuous at the point α0 and the function f continuous at the point (b(α0),α0), for every ε such that 0<ε<1 there exists an r>0 such that the relation ∣α−α0∣≤r entails that ∥f(t,α)−f(b(α0),α0)∥≤ε for all t belonging to the interval with endpoints b(α0) and b(α); thus one may also suppose that the relation ∣α−α0∣≤r entails α−α0b(α)−b(α0)−b′(α0)≤ε.
By the mean value formula (II, p 62, formula (17)) one thus has
which shows that α−α01∫b(α0)b(α)f(t,α)dt tends to b′(α0)f(b(α0),α0). In the same way one shows that α−α01∫a(α0)a(α)f(t,α)dt tends to a′(α0)f(a(α0),α0).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.