Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 08JS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08JS].

Integration, chapter II, § 1. Riesz spaces and fully lattice-ordered spaces

For an ordered vector space E to be fully lattice-ordered, it is necessary and sufficient that E be a Riesz space and that it satisfy one of the following two conditions:

a) every nonempty subset A, consisting of elements ≥0\geq 0 of E, that is bounded above and directed for the relation ≤\leq, has a supremum in E;

b) every nonempty subset AA, consisting of elements ⩾0\geqslant 0 of EE and directed for the relation ⩾\geqslant, has an infimum in EE.

The conditions are obviously necessary. Conversely, suppose that EE is a Riesz space satisfying the condition a). Let BB be a nonempty subset of EE that is bounded above; the set CC consisting of the suprema of the finite subsets of BB is directed for the relation ⩽\leqslant; let aa be one its elements and CaC_a the set of x∈Cx \in C that are ⩾a\geqslant a; if we prove that CaC_a has a supremum then it will also be the supremum of BB. Now, Ca−aC_a - a is a set of elements ⩾0\geqslant 0, bounded above and directed for the relation ⩽\leqslant; it therefore has a supremum bb, consequently a+ba + b is the supremum of CaC_a.

On the other hand, the condition b) implies a): for, if FF is a nonempty set of elements ⩾0\geqslant 0 of EE, bounded above and directed for ⩽\leqslant, and if cc is an upper bound for FF, then c−Fc - F is a set of elements ⩾0\geqslant 0 that is directed for ⩾\geqslant; if it has an infimum mm, then c−mc - m is the supremum of FF.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.