Let us take for X the compact space U of complex numbers of absolute value 1. On setting μ(f)=∫01f(e2iπt)dt for every f∈H(U), one defines a positive measure of mass 1 on U. On the other hand, let θ be a real number; for every integer n≥0, let νn be the unit mass placed at the point e2iπnθ of U, and let
μn=n+11(ν0+⋯+νn),
so that μn is a positive measure of mass 1 on U. Then, if θ is irrational, μn tends vaguely to μ. For, since the linear combinations of the functions z↦zk (k∈Z) are dense in H(U) (GT, X, §4, No. 4, Prop. 8), it suffices to prove that μn(zk) tends to μ(zk) for k∈Z. Now, for k=0, μn(zk)=μ(zk)=1; for k=0,
μn(zk)=n+11(1+e2iπkθ+e4iπkθ+⋯+e2iπknθ).
Since e2iπkθ=1 (because θ is irrational), we infer that
therefore μn(zk) tends to 0=μ(zk). Under these conditions, Proposition 22 can be applied, and we see in particular that if A is a subset of U with negligible boundary with respect to μ, then μn(A) tends to μ(A). In other words, if pn denotes the number of integers k∈[0,n] such that e2iπkθ∈A, then n−1pn tends to μ(A) as n tends to +∞.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.