Bourbaki

Theorem 1 (Choquet)

Tag 08YS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08YS].

Integration, chapter IV, § 7. Barycenters

— Let E be a Hausdorff locally convex space over R\mathbf{R}, K a metrizable compact convex subset of E, and M the set of extremal points of K. The set M is the intersection of a countable family of open sets in K, and every point of K is the barycenter of a measure μ\mu on K such that μ(K−M)=0\mu(K - M) = 0.

To prove the first assertion, denote by I the interval [0,1][0, 1] of R\mathbf{R}; since K is compact and metrizable, so is K×K×IK \times K \times I; the subset U of K×K×IK \times K \times I formed by the triples (x,y,λ)(x, y, \lambda) such that x≠yx \neq y and 0<λ<10 < \lambda < 1 is open in K×K×IK \times K \times I, therefore there exists a sequence (Fn)(F_n) of closed sets in K×K×IK \times K \times I whose union is U (GT, IX, §2, No. 5, Prop. 7). The mapping q:K×K×I→Kq : K \times K \times I \to K defined by q(x,y,λ)=λx+(1−λ)yq(x, y, \lambda) = \lambda x + (1 - \lambda) y is continuous and, by the definition of extremal point, K−M=q(U)=⋃nq(Fn)K - M = q(U) = \bigcup_n q(F_n); but FnF_n is compact since it is closed in K×K×IK \times K \times I, therefore q(Fn)q(F_n) is compact and therefore closed in K; the set Un=K−q(Fn)U_n = K - q(F_n) is therefore open in K, and we have M=⋂nUnM = \bigcap_n U_n.

In the continuation of the proof, we shall denote by uu a continuous and convex numerical function on K, by G⊂E×RG \subset E \times \mathbf{R} the graph of uu, and by S the closed convex envelope of G in E×RE \times \mathbf{R}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.