Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 08YV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08YV].

Integration, chapter IV, § 7. Barycenters

Let E be a Hausdorff locally convex space over R\mathbf{R}, and K a metrizable compact convex subset of E. Then, there exists a strictly convex numerical function on K.

For, the Banach space C(K;R)\mathscr{C}(K; \mathbf{R}) is separable (GT, X, §3, No. 3, Th. 1), therefore so is the subspace A\mathscr{A} of C(K;R)\mathscr{C}(K; \mathbf{R}) formed by the restrictions to K of the continuous affine linear functions on E. Thus let (hn)(h_n) be a sequence dense in A\mathscr{A}, and let αn>sup⁡x∈K∣hn(x)∣\alpha_n > \sup_{\mathbf{x} \in K} |h_n(\mathbf{x})|. Then each of the functions hn2/n2αn2h_n^2 / n^2 \alpha_n^2 is convex in K (TVS, II, §2, No. 8, Examples), and the series with general term hn2/n2αn2h_n^2 / n^2 \alpha_n^2 is normally convergent, therefore its sum uu is continuous and convex in K. It remains to see that uu is strictly convex, and for this it suffices to prove that for any two distinct points x,x′\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}' of K, there is an integer nn such that the restriction of hn2h_n^2 to the segment with endpoints x,x′\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{x}' is strictly convex; but for this it suffices that hn(x)≠hn(x′)h_n(\mathbf{x}) \neq h_n(\mathbf{x}') (loc. cit.). Now, there exists a function h∈Ah \in \mathscr{A} such that h(x)≠h(x′)h(\mathbf{x}) \neq h(\mathbf{x}') (TVS, II, §4, No. 1, Cor. 1 of Prop. 2) and since the sequence (hn)(h_n) is dense in A\mathscr{A}, there exists an nn such that hn(x)≠hn(x′)h_n(\mathbf{x}) \neq h_n(\mathbf{x}').

Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.