*Let F be a closed subset of X. The following properties are equivalent: a) F contains SˇH(X). b) For every function f∈H, F intersects the set of points of X where ∣f∣ attains its supremum. c) For every point x∈X, there exists a positive measure μ of total mass 1 on X such that Supp(μ)⊂F and f(x)=∫fdμ for every function f∈H. Let us prove the equivalence of the conditions a) and c): let f=f1+if2 with f1,f2 in Hr; the relation f(x)=∫fdμ is equivalent to the two relations f1(x)=∫f1dμ and f2(x)=∫f2dμ; it thus suffices to apply to Hr the equivalence of the conditions a) and c) of Prop. 7 of No. 3. The fact that a) implies b) follows from Prop. 9. Let us show that b) implies a); this is a matter of seeing that if b) is verified, then, for every h∈Hr, F intersects the set of points where h attains its infimum in X. The condition b) implies that F is nonempty; since F is compact, there exists a∈F such that h(a)≤h(y) for all y∈F. Let f∈H be such that h=R(f); for every ε>0, the function g=f−h(a)+ε belongs to H, and
R(g(y))=h(y)−h(a)+ε≥ε for all
y∈F. Let
c be the supremum of
∣g∣ in X, and set
b=c2/2ε; for every
y∈F,
∣g(y)−b∣2=∣g(y)∣2−2bR((g(y)))+b2≤c2−2bε+b2=b2, in other words, the supremum in F of the function
∣g−b∣ is
≤b. Since
g−b∈H, the hypothesis on F implies that
∣g−b∣≤b, whence
b2≥∣g−b∣2=∣g∣2−2bR(g)+b2 and so
R(g)≥∣g∣2/2b≥0; since
R(g)=h−h(a)+ε, and
ε>0 is arbitrary, we have
h≥h(a), and
h(a) is the infimum of
h in X, which completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.