Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 08Z4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08Z4].

Integration, chapter IV, § 7. Barycenters

*Let FF be a closed subset of XX. The following properties are equivalent: a) FF contains SˇH(X)\check{S}_{\mathscr{H}}(X). b) For every function f∈Hf \in \mathscr{H}, FF intersects the set of points of XX where ∣f∣|f| attains its supremum. c) For every point x∈Xx \in X, there exists a positive measure μ\mu of total mass 1 on XX such that Supp(μ)⊂F\mathrm{Supp}(\mu) \subset F and f(x)=∫fdμf(x) = \int f d\mu for every function f∈Hf \in \mathscr{H}. Let us prove the equivalence of the conditions a) and c): let f=f1+if2f = f_1 + i f_2 with f1,f2f_1, f_2 in Hr\mathscr{H}_r; the relation f(x)=∫fdμf(x) = \int f d\mu is equivalent to the two relations f1(x)=∫f1dμf_1(x) = \int f_1 d\mu and f2(x)=∫f2dμf_2(x) = \int f_2 d\mu; it thus suffices to apply to Hr\mathscr{H}_r the equivalence of the conditions a) and c) of Prop. 7 of No. 3. The fact that a) implies b) follows from Prop. 9. Let us show that b) implies a); this is a matter of seeing that if b) is verified, then, for every h∈Hrh \in \mathscr{H}_r, F intersects the set of points where hh attains its infimum in X. The condition b) implies that F is nonempty; since F is compact, there exists a∈Fa \in F such that h(a)≤h(y)h(a) \leq h(y) for all y∈Fy \in F. Let f∈Hf \in \mathscr{H} be such that h=R(f)h = \mathscr{R}(f); for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, the function g=f−h(a)+εg = f - h(a) + \varepsilon belongs to H\mathscr{H}, and

R(g(y))=h(y)−h(a)+ε≥ε \mathscr{R}(g(y)) = h(y) - h(a) + \varepsilon \geq \varepsilon
for all y∈Fy \in F. Let cc be the supremum of ∣g∣|g| in X, and set b=c2/2εb = c^2 / 2\varepsilon; for every y∈Fy \in F,
∣g(y)−b∣2=∣g(y)∣2−2bR((g(y)))+b2≤c2−2bε+b2=b2, |g(y) - b|^2 = |g(y)|^2 - 2b \mathscr{R}((g(y))) + b^2 \leq c^2 - 2b\varepsilon + b^2 = b^2,
in other words, the supremum in F of the function ∣g−b∣|g - b| is ≤b\leq b. Since g−b∈Hg - b \in \mathscr{H}, the hypothesis on F implies that ∣g−b∣≤b|g - b| \leq b, whence
b2≥∣g−b∣2=∣g∣2−2bR(g)+b2 b^2 \geq |g - b|^2 = |g|^2 - 2b \mathscr{R}(g) + b^2
and so R(g)≥∣g∣2/2b≥0\mathscr{R}(g) \geq |g|^2 / 2b \geq 0; since R(g)=h−h(a)+ε\mathscr{R}(g) = h - h(a) + \varepsilon, and ε>0\varepsilon > 0 is arbitrary, we have h≥h(a)h \geq h(a), and h(a)h(a) is the infimum of hh in X, which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.