Bourbaki

Lemma 6

Tag 08ZB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08ZB].

Integration, chapter IV, § 7. Barycenters

We maintain the hypotheses and notations of Lemma 5, and assume the fλf_\lambda to be positive. The function f‾\overline{f} is positively homogeneous, concave and upper semi-continuous in CC. It is affine if CC is lattice-ordered.

It is clear that f‾\overline{f} is positively homogeneous. Let x,yx, y belong to CC. If x1,…,xm,y1,…,ynx_1, \ldots, x_m, y_1, \ldots, y_n in CC are such that x1+⋯+xm=x, y1+⋯+yn=yx_1 + \cdots + x_m = x,\ y_1 + \cdots + y_n = y, then x1+⋯+xm+y1+⋯+yn=x+yx_1 + \cdots + x_m + y_1 + \cdots + y_n = x + y, therefore

f(x1)+⋯+f(xm)+f(y1)+⋯+f(yn)≤f‾(x+y); f(x_1) + \cdots + f(x_m) + f(y_1) + \cdots + f(y_n) \leq \overline{f}(x + y);

it follows that f‾(x)+f‾(y)≤f‾(x+y)\overline{f}(x) + \overline{f}(y) \leq \overline{f}(x + y), therefore f‾\overline{f} is concave. Let LL (resp. LλL_\lambda) be the set of (t,x)∈R×E(t, x) \in \mathbf{R} \times E such that x∈Cx \in C and 0≤t≤f‾(x)0 \leq t \leq \overline{f}(x) (resp. 0≤t≤fλ(x)0 \leq t \leq f_\lambda(x)). Each of the LλL_\lambda is closed in the weakly complete proper convex cone R+×C\mathbf{R}_+ \times C, therefore the sum ∑λ∈ΛLλ\sum_{\lambda \in \Lambda} L_\lambda is closed (TVS, II, §6, No. 8, Cor. 2 of Prop. 11). By Lemma 5, this sum is equal to LL. Therefore LL is closed, which proves that f‾\overline{f} is upper semi-continuous. Finally, assume CC is lattice-ordered, and let us prove that f‾\overline{f} is convex. Let x,yx, y belong to CC and let ε>0\varepsilon > 0. There exist z1,z2,…,znz_1, z_2, \ldots, z_n in CC such that f(z1)+⋯+f(zn)≥f‾(x+y)−εf(z_1) + \cdots + f(z_n) \geq \overline{f}(x + y) - \varepsilon and z1+⋯+zn=x+yz_1 + \cdots + z_n = x + y. The vector space C−CC - C is lattice-ordered for the order induced by that of EE (A, VI, §1, No. 9, Prop. 8). By the decomposition theorem (loc. cit., No. 10, Th. 1), there exist x1,…,xn,y1,…,ynx_1, \ldots, x_n, y_1, \ldots, y_n in CC such that

x1+y1=z1, …, xn+yn=zn, x1+⋯+xn=x, y1+⋯+yn=y. x_1 + y_1 = z_1,\ \ldots,\ x_n + y_n = z_n,\ x_1 + \cdots + x_n = x,\ y_1 + \cdots + y_n = y.

Then, since ff is positively homogeneous and convex,

f‾(x+y)≤ε+f(z1)+⋯+f(zn)≤ε+f(x1)+f(y1)+⋯+f(xn)+f(yn)≤ε+f‾(x)+f‾(y). \begin{align*} \overline{f}(x + y) &\leq \varepsilon + f(z_1) + \cdots + f(z_n) \\ &\leq \varepsilon + f(x_1) + f(y_1) + \cdots + f(x_n) + f(y_n) \\ &\leq \varepsilon + \overline{f}(x) + \overline{f}(y). \end{align*}

Since ε\varepsilon is an arbitrary number >0> 0, we have proved that f‾\overline{f} is indeed convex.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.