We maintain the hypotheses and notations of Lemma 5, and assume the fλ to be positive. The function f is positively homogeneous, concave and upper semi-continuous in C. It is affine if C is lattice-ordered.
It is clear that f is positively homogeneous. Let x,y belong to C. If x1,…,xm,y1,…,yn in C are such that x1+⋯+xm=x, y1+⋯+yn=y, then x1+⋯+xm+y1+⋯+yn=x+y, therefore
f(x1)+⋯+f(xm)+f(y1)+⋯+f(yn)≤f(x+y);
it follows that f(x)+f(y)≤f(x+y), therefore f is concave. Let L (resp. Lλ) be the set of (t,x)∈R×E such that x∈C and 0≤t≤f(x) (resp. 0≤t≤fλ(x)). Each of the Lλ is closed in the weakly complete proper convex cone R+×C, therefore the sum ∑λ∈ΛLλ is closed (TVS, II, §6, No. 8, Cor. 2 of Prop. 11). By Lemma 5, this sum is equal to L. Therefore L is closed, which proves that f is upper semi-continuous. Finally, assume C is lattice-ordered, and let us prove that f is convex. Let x,y belong to C and let ε>0. There exist z1,z2,…,zn in C such that f(z1)+⋯+f(zn)≥f(x+y)−ε and z1+⋯+zn=x+y. The vector space C−C is lattice-ordered for the order induced by that of E (A, VI, §1, No. 9, Prop. 8). By the decomposition theorem (loc. cit., No. 10, Th. 1), there exist x1,…,xn,y1,…,yn in C such that
x1+y1=z1, …, xn+yn=zn, x1+⋯+xn=x, y1+⋯+yn=y.
Then, since f is positively homogeneous and convex,
f(x+y)≤ε+f(z1)+⋯+f(zn)≤ε+f(x1)+f(y1)+⋯+f(xn)+f(yn)≤ε+f(x)+f(y).
Since ε is an arbitrary number >0, we have proved that f is indeed convex.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.