Let E be a Hausdorff locally convex space, C a proper convex cone with vertex 0 in E, admitting a compact sole M, and let G be the union of the extremal generators of C. Let x∈M. If C is lattice-ordered, then there exists at most one positive measure λ of mass 1 on M, such that λ∗(M−(G∩M))=0, and admitting x as barycenter.
Replacing the topology of E by the weakened topology (which does not change the topology of M), one can suppose E to be a weak space. Let λ and λ′ be two measures on M having the stated properties, and let h be a continuous linear form on E such that M is the intersection of C and the hyperplane with equation h(x)=1. Let S be the subset of C(M) consisting of the restrictions to M of the positively homogeneous and continuous convex functions ≥0 on C. The cone C is weakly complete (TVS, II, §7, No. 3). By Th. 3, λ(f)=λ′(f) for every f∈S.
If f1,f2,f3,f4 belong to S, then
sup(f1−f2,f3−f4)inf(f1−f2,f3−f4)=sup(f1+f4,f3+f2)−(f2+f4)∈S−S=−sup(f2−f1,f4−f3)∈S−S. Since
h∣M∈S,
S−S contains the constant functions. If x and y are two distinct points of M, there exists a continuous linear form on E that separates x and y, and this form is the difference of two continuous linear forms that are positive on C (TVS, II, §6, No. 8, Lemma 1). It follows from the foregoing that for
α,β real, there exists
f∈S−S such that
f(x)=α,f(y)=β. Then
S−S is dense in
C(M) for the topology of uniform convergence (GT, X, §4, No. 1, Cor. of Prop. 2). Since
λ and
λ′ coincide on
S−S, we have
λ=λ′.
Exercises
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.