Corollary
Tag 098U, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 098U].
Integration, chapter VI, § 1. Integration of vector-valued functions
— The condition b) of Prop. 9 is satisfied in each of the following two cases:
The measure is bounded, and if is its support, then is an equicontinuous subset of .
The condition a) of Prop. 9 is satisfied, the space is barreled, and, for every compact subset of , is a bounded subset of .
Let us first place ourselves in case . We can restrict ourselves to the case that (Ch. V, §7, No. 1, Th. 1). Then, for every equicontinuous subset of , there exists an equicontinuous, convex, balanced and weakly closed subset such that for all and all (TVS, II, §6, No. 4, Prop. 6). Since is scalarly -integrable, the mapping of into the dual of equipped with , is scalarly -integrable, and one may write
Since is convex and compact for , the Cor. of Prop. 5 of No. 2 shows that for every , which proves our assertion.
Let us now place ourselves in case . For every and every compact subset of , set
an element of the algebraic dual of . Since is barreled, every bounded subset of is equicontinuous (TVS, III, §4, No. 2, Th. 1); the first part of the argument, applied to the function and the bounded measure , shows that . Moreover, for the topology , one has , the limit being taken with respect to the increasing directed set of compact subsets of (Ch. V, §1, No. 3, Prop. 10). To verify condition b) of Prop. 9, it suffices, by Prop. 9, to prove that the linear mapping of into defined by (1) is continuous; moreover, is barreled, therefore it will suffice to prove that is continuous when and are equipped with their weakened topologies (TVS, IV, §1, No. 3, Prop. 7); finally, by virtue of (2), one is reduced to showing that for every . Since is in the closure, for , of the set of the , where runs over the set of compact subsets of , it suffices to prove that is equicontinuous (TVS, III, §3, No. 4, Prop. 4); and since is barreled, it comes to the same to say that for every , the set of is bounded (TVS, III, §4, No. 2, Th. 1). But this follows at once from the relations
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.