Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 09AL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09AL].

Integration, chapter VI, § 2. Vectorial measures . "

— Let μ\mu be a positive measure on TT, mm a measure on TT with values in FF, with base μ\mu and density ff with respect to μ\mu. Let qq be a lower semi-continuous semi-norm on FF.

a) If, for every compact subset KK of TT, the upper integral ∫K∗(q∘f) dμ\int_K^*(q \circ f)\,d\mu is finite, then mm is qq-majorizable.

b) If mm is qq-majorizable, then q(m)q(m) has base μ\mu; if in addition ff is μ\mu-measurable as a mapping of TT into FσF_\sigma, then q∘fq \circ f is locally μ\mu-integrable and q(m)=(q∘f)⋅μq(m) = (q \circ f) \cdot \mu.

a) For every finite subset JJ of Aq′A'_q, let us denote by λJ\lambda_J the supremum of the measures ∣z′∘m∣|z' \circ m|, where z′z' runs over JJ; if gJ=sup⁡z′∈J∣⟨z′,f⟩∣g_J = \sup_{z' \in J} |\langle z', f \rangle| then λJ=gJ⋅μ\lambda_J = g_J \cdot \mu (Ch. V, §5, No. 2, Prop. 2). For every relatively compact open subset UU of TT, let λJ,U\lambda_{J,U} be the restriction of λJ\lambda_J to UU; let us first show that as JJ runs over the directed set F\mathfrak{F} of finite subsets of Aq′A'_q, the family (λJ,U)(\lambda_{J,U}) is bounded above in M(U)\mathscr{M}(U). Indeed, for every function h≥0h \geq 0 in K(U)K(U),

∫h dλJ,U=∫hgJ dμ≤∫∗(q∘f)h dμ≤∥h∥∫U∗(q∘f) dμ, \int h\,d\lambda_{J,U} = \int hg_J\,d\mu \leq \int^*(q \circ f)h\,d\mu \leq \|h\| \int_U^*(q \circ f)\,d\mu,

whence our assertion (Ch. II, §2, No. 2). Let νU\nu_U be the supremum of this family of measures in M(U)\mathscr{M}(U). If U′U' is a second relatively compact open subset of TT such that U⊂U′U \subset U', then νU\nu_U is the restriction of νU′\nu_{U'} to UU, as follows immediately from the expression of the supremum of an increasing directed set of measures (Ch. II, §2, No. 2) and the fact that λJ,U\lambda_{J,U} is the restriction to UU of λJ,U′\lambda_{J,U'}. Thus there is one and only one positive measure ν\nu whose restriction to each UU is νU\nu_U (Ch. III, §2, No. 1, Prop. 1), and it is clear that ν=q(m)\nu = q(m).

b) Since the measures λJ\lambda_J have base μ\mu, so does their supremum q(m)q(m) (Ch. V, §5, No. 5, Th. 2). If ff is μ\mu-measurable for the topology σ(F,F′)\sigma(F, F') on FF, it follows at once from the definitions that the mapping g:t↦(gJ(t))J∈Fg : t \mapsto (g_J(t))_{J \in \mathfrak{F}} of TT into the product space RF\mathbf{R}^\mathfrak{F} is μ\mu-measurable. The restriction of q∘f=sup⁡J∈FgJq \circ f = \sup_{J \in \mathfrak{F}} g_J to every compact subset of TT on which gg is continuous is lower semi-continuous; consequently q∘fq \circ f is μ\mu-measurable (Ch. IV, §5, No. 5, Cor. of Prop. 8 and No. 10, Prop. 15). Let KK be a compact subset of T; it admits a partition consisting of a μ\mu-negligible set and a sequence (Kn)(K_n) of compact sets on which gg is continuous. Then ∫Kn∗(q∘f) dμ=sup⁡J∫KngJ dμ≤∫Kndq(m)\int_{K_n}^*(q \circ f)\, d\mu = \sup_J \int_{K_n} g_J\, d\mu \leq \int_{K_n} dq(m) for all nn (Ch. IV, §1, No. 1, Th. 1 and Ch. V, §7, No. 1, Prop. 1), whence ∫K∗(q∘f) dμ=∑n∫Kn∗(q∘f) dμ≤∫Kdq(m)\int_K^*(q \circ f)\, d\mu = \sum_n \int_{K_n}^*(q \circ f)\, d\mu \leq \int_K dq(m). But this proves that q∘fq \circ f is locally μ\mu-integrable and that λJ≤(q∘f)⋅μ≤q(m)\lambda_J \leq (q \circ f) \cdot \mu \leq q(m) for all J∈FJ \in \mathscr{F}; whence, by definition, q(m)=(q∘f)⋅μq(m) = (q \circ f) \cdot \mu.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.