Remark
Tag 09CZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09CZ].
Integration, chapter VII, § 1. Construction of a Haar measure
— 1) Assume invariant. Then , , are invariant. If is real, then and are invariant. 2) Assume relatively invariant and nonzero. There exists, for every , a unique complex number such that
(7)
and the function on is a representation of in , called the multiplier of . The formula (5) then gives
and formula (6) gives
With the conventions made above, (7) may also be written
3) Since , to say that is quasi-invariant amounts to saying that is quasi-invariant.
If is quasi-invariant and is another measure on equivalent to , then is equivalent to , hence to , hence to , and so is quasi-invariant. To say that is quasi-invariant under therefore means that the class of is invariant under .
For to be quasi-invariant, it is necessary and sufficient that the set of locally -negligible subsets of be invariant under (Ch. V, §5, No. 5, Th. 2), or again that, for every -negligible compact subset of and for every , be -negligible (loc. cit., Remark).
If is quasi-invariant, then the support of is invariant under . In particular if is transitive in (A, I, §5, No. 5, Def. 6), this support is either empty (if ) or equal to (if ).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
- I, §5, No. 5, Def. 6 not yet on this site
- V, §5, No. 5, Th. 2