(i) Any two elements of Mρ(G) are convolvable. (ii) For convolution, and for the norm ∥λ∥, Mρ(G) is a complete normed algebra, admitting εe as unity element. (iii) C′(G) is a subalgebra of Mρ(G).
Let λ,μ be in Mρ(G), and let us show that λ and μ are convolvable. Let f∈K+(G). Since ρ is >0 and lower semi-continuous, there exists a constant k>0 such that f≤kρ. Then
∫∗f(st)d∣λ∣(s)d∣μ∣(t)≤k∫∗ρ(st)d∣λ∣(s)d∣μ∣(t)
≤k∫∗ρ(s)ρ(t)d∣λ∣(s)d∣μ∣(t)
=k(∫∗ρ(s)d∣λ∣(s))(∫∗ρ(t)d∣μ∣(t))
(Ch. V, §8, No. 3, Cor. 1 of Prop. 8). Therefore (s,t)↦f(st) is (λ⊗μ)-integrable, so that λ and μ are convolvable. On the other hand, using Ch. V (§1, Prop. 4, §6, Prop. 2, §8, Cor. 1 of Prop. 8) and the fact that (s,t)↦ρ(s)ρ(t) is lower semi-continuous in G×G, one has
∫G∗ρ(s)d∣λ∗μ∣(s)=∫G∗ρ(s)d∣λ∗μ∣(s)
≤∫G×G∗ρ(st)d∣λ∣(s)d∣μ∣(t)≤∫G×G∗ρ(s)ρ(t)d∣λ∣(s)d∣μ∣(t)
=∫G×G∗ρ(s)ρ(t)d∣λ∣(s)d∣μ∣(t)=∥λ∥⋅∥μ∥.
One sees that λ∗μ∈Mρ(G) and that ∥λ∗μ∥≤∥λ∥⋅∥μ∥. In view of Prop. 1, Mρ(G) is an algebra. The mapping λ↦ρ⋅λ is an isometric linear mapping θ of Mρ(G) into M1(G); if μ∈M1(G) then 1/ρ, which is locally bounded and upper semi-continuous, is locally μ-integrable, and ρ is (1/ρ)⋅μ-integrable, thus (1/ρ)⋅μ∈Mρ(G); this proves that θ is surjective; therefore Mρ(G) is a complete normed algebra. Finally, it is clear that εe is a unity element for Mρ(G) and that C′(G) is a subalgebra of Mρ(G) (§1, No. 4, Cor. of Prop. 5).
If ρ=1, Prop. 2, (i) and (ii) also follow from §1, Prop. 2.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.