Let f∈F+(T). If f is μ-moderated, then μ∗(f)=μ∙(f); if f is not μ-moderated, then μ∗(f)=+∞.
If μ∗(f)<+∞, there exists a lower semi-continuous function g≥f such that μ∙(g)<+∞. For every n∈N, let Gn be the set of t∈T such that g(t)>1/n; the set Gn is open, one has μ∙(Gn)≤nμ∙(g)<+∞, and f is zero outside the union of the Gn: the function f is therefore moderated.
Next, let us show that μ∗ and μ∙ have the same value for moderated functions. Since μ∗ and μ∙ are encumbrances, it suffices to establish the relation μ∗(f)=μ∙(f) when f is a positive function, bounded above by a constant M, and zero outside an open set G of finite measure, which we shall now do.
The measure μ is the supremum, in M(T), of an increasing directed family (μi)i∈I of measures with compact support: this follows at once from Prop. 9 of No. 8. Let g be a lower semi-continuous function on T, between f and the lower semi-continuous function MφG. Set νi=μ−μi; then μ∙=μi∙+νi∙ (No. 2, Remark 1), consequently
μ∙(g)−μ∙(f)=(μi∙(g)−μi∙(f))+(νi∙(g)−νi∙(f)) ≤(μi∙(g)−μi∙(f))+νi∙(MφG). One has
νi∙(MφG)=μ∙(MφG)−μi∙(MφG) and
μ∙(MφG)=supμi∙(MφG) (No. 7, Prop. 6); the number
νi∙(MφG) may therefore be made arbitrarily small by a suitable choice of
i. Thus everything comes down to showing that one can find, for any number
c>0 and any index
i∈I, a lower semi-continuous function
g between
f and
MφG, such that
μi∙(g)−μi∙(f)≤c. Now, let L be the compact support of the measure
μi, and let
λ be the measure
(μi)L; since
μi is concentrated on L, one has
μi∙(h)=μi∙(hφL)=λ∙(hL) for every function
h∈F+(T) (No. 1, Lemma 1 and No. 2, Prop. 2); therefore
μi∙(g)−μi∙(f)=λ∙(gL)−λ∙(fL).
¹ The cited appendix in TG does not appear in GT (which translated an earlier edition of Ch. IX). Lindelöf spaces are defined in GT, I, §9, Exer. 14; this exercise and the definition of Souslin space (GT, IX, §6, No. 2, Def. 2) cover the material needed here.
But L is compact; therefore λ∗=λ∗, consequently there exists a lower semi-continuous function h defined on L, that is ≥fL and is such that λ∗(h)≤λ∗(fL)+c. Since the set L is closed in T, the function k equal to h on L, and to +∞ on T−L, is lower semi-continuous on T and is ≥f, and λ∗(kL)=λ∗(h)≤λ∗(fL)+c. It remains only to set g=inf(k,MφG): g is lower semi-continuous, g≥f and
μi∗(g)≤μi∗(k)=λ∗(kL)≤λ∗(fL)+c=μi∗(f)+c.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.