— Let p∈[1,+∞[; one denotes by Lp(T,μ) (resp. LFp(T,μ) if F is a Banach space) the set of mappings f of T into R (resp. into F) that are μ-measurable and satisfy μ∙(∣f∣p)<+∞. One denotes by Lp(T,μ) (resp. LFp(T,μ)*) the set of μ-moderated elements of* Lp(T,μ) (resp. LFp(T,μ)*).*
We will write Np(f)=(μ∙(∣f∣p))1/p, Np(f)=(μ∗(∣f∣p))1/p. We denote by N∞(f) the infimum of the numbers k≥0 such that ∣f∣≤k locally μ-almost everywhere; if N∞(f)<+∞, f is said to be essentially bounded. The set of measurable and essentially bounded mappings of T into R (resp. into F) is denoted L∞(T,μ) (resp. LF∞(T,μ)). The elements of LF1(T,μ) (resp. LF1(T,μ)) are called essentially integrable functions (resp. integrable functions) with values in F.
If μ is a complex measure, one sets
LFp(T,μ)=LFp(T,∣μ∣)andLFp(T,μ)=LFp(T,∣μ∣).
The above notations are often abbreviated to LFp(μ), LFp or Lp(μ), Lp, if this does not lead to any confusion.
We saw in No. 8 (Scholium) that one can construct a locally compact space T', having the same underlying set as T and a topology finer than that of T, and equip T' with a measure μ′ such that the μ-measurable functions and the μ′-measurable functions are the same, and such that the essential upper integrals of positive functions for μ and μ′ are equal. It follows that the sets LFp(μ) and LFp(μ′) are identical for 1≤p≤+∞ (1). This also implies without new proof that LFp is a vector space, and that the function Np is a semi-norm on LFp(μ), for which this space is complete.
Let f be an element of LFp (1≤p<+∞); since one has μ∙(∣f∣p)=μ′∙(∣f∣p)<+∞, Prop. 7 of Ch. V, §1, No. 2 implies that f is zero outside
(1) Note that the space LFp(μ) is contained in LFp(μ′), but is in general distinct from it.
the union of a sequence of compact subsets of T' and a locally μ′-negligible set; the latter set being locally μ-negligible, and every compact subset of T' being compact in T, it follows that f is equal locally μ-almost everywhere to a μ-moderated function. Let us denote by NF (resp. NF) the space of locally μ-negligible (resp. μ-negligible) functions; we thus have LFp=LFp+NF, and NF=LFp∩NF (No. 9, Cor. 1 of Prop. 14). The space LFp/NF may therefore be canonically identified with LFp/NF, and one verifies immediately that this identification preserves norm; this quotient space is denoted LFp(μ). It can be interpreted as the normed space associated with each of the semi-normed spaces LFp(μ) and LFp(μ); since LFp is complete, the same is true of LFp and LFp.
The set of functions f with values in F, continuous on T' with compact support, is dense in LFp(μ′)=LFp(μ) (Ch. IV, §3, No. 4, Def. 2). Let us take up again the notations of the Scholium of No. 8. Since a compact subset of T' intersects only a finite number of the compact sets Kα, every continuous function f on T' with compact support may be written as a sum
f=α∈A∑fα+g, where
fα is, for every
α, the extension by 0 of a continuous function on
Kα, where
fα=0 except for a finite number of indices, and where g is locally
μ-negligible. We thus have the following result:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.