Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 09S9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09S9].

Integration, IX, p. 76, § 6. Promeasures and measures on a locally convex space

Let EE be a locally convex space. The mapping μ↦Fμ\mu \mapsto \mathscr{F}\mu of the set of promeasures on EE into the set of functions on E′E' is injective.

The formula (5) permits reducing to the case that EE is finite-dimensional; since every finite-dimensional space is isomorphic to a space Rn\mathbf{R}^n, we can even suppose that there exists an integer n⩾0n \geqslant 0 such that E=RnE = \mathbf{R}^n. We therefore have to prove that if μ\mu is a bounded measure (not necessarily positive) on Rn\mathbf{R}^n and if

∫Rnei⟨x,y⟩dμ(x)=0 \int_{\mathbf{R}^n} e^{i\langle x, y \rangle} d\mu(x) = 0

for every linear form yy on Rn\mathbf{R}^n, then μ=0\mu = 0.

For every integer m⩾0m \geqslant 0, let GmG_m be the subgroup m⋅Znm \cdot \mathbf{Z}^n of Rn\mathbf{R}^n. Denote by Cm\mathscr{C}_m the vector space of continuous functions ff on Rn\mathbf{R}^n such that f(x+a)=f(x)f(x + a) = f(x) for x∈Rnx \in \mathbf{R}^n and a∈Gma \in G_m. By Prop. 8 of GT, X, §4, No. 4, every function in Cm\mathscr{C}_m is the uniform limit of finite linear combinations of functions of the type x↦e2πi⟨x,q⟩x \mapsto e^{2\pi i \langle x, q \rangle} with q∈m−1⋅Znq \in m^{-1} \cdot \mathbf{Z}^n. Therefore μ(f)=0\mu(f) = 0 for every function f∈Cmf \in \mathscr{C}_m.

Let ff be a continuous function on Rn\mathbf{R}^n with compact support. For every integer m⩾0m \geqslant 0, set fm(x)=∑q∈Gmf(x+q)f_m(x) = \sum_{q \in G_m} f(x + q). It is immediate that for every x∈Rnx \in \mathbf{R}^n, the preceding series has only finitely many terms, and that fmf_m belongs to Cm\mathscr{C}_m. Moreover, it is easy to see that the sequence (fm)(f_m) tends to ff uniformly on every compact set, and that there exists a constant C⩾0C \geqslant 0 such that ∣fm∣⩽C|f_m| \leqslant C for all mm. Consequently, μ(f)=lim⁡m→∞μ(fm)\mu(f) = \lim_{m \to \infty} \mu(f_m) by Prop. 12 of §5, No. 6. Since fm∈Cmf_m \in \mathscr{C}_m, we have μ(fm)=0\mu(f_m) = 0, whence finally μ(f)=0\mu(f) = 0. Thus μ=0\mu = 0.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.