Let g be a Lie algebra over K, M a K-module and ρ a homomorphism of g into gl(M). If M is considered as a commutative Lie algebra, the Lie algebra of derivations of M is gl(M). We can therefore form the semi-direct product h of g by M corresponding to ρ.
In particular, let g=gl(M) and ρ be the identity mapping of gl(M). The semi-direct product of g by M is then denoted by af(M) (or af(n,K) if M=Kn). An element of af(M) is an ordered pair (m,u), where m∈M,u∈gl(M); and the bracket is defined by
[(m,u),(m′,u′)]=(u(m′)−u′(m),[u,u′]).
*When M is a finite-dimensional vector space over R, af(M) is canonically identified with the Lie algebra of the affine group of M.*
Let t be a Lie algebra over K. A linear mapping θ of t into af(M) can be written x↦((ζ(x),η(x))), where ζ is a linear mapping of t into M and η a linear mapping of t into gl(M). We examine the conditions that ζ and η must satisfy for θ to be a homomorphism. For x∈t,y∈t, we must have
θ([x,y])=[θ(x),θ(y)]
that is
(ζ([x,y]),η([x,y]))=[(ζ(x),η(x)),(ζ(y),η(y))]=(η(x)⋅ζ(y)−η(y)⋅ζ(x),[η(x),η(y)]).
Hence for θ to be a homomorphism of t into af(M), it is necessary and sufficient that η be a homomorphism of t into gl(M) and that ζ satisfy the relation:
(13)
ζ([x,y])=η(x)⋅ζ(y)−η(y)⋅ζ(x).
Let N be the K-module M×K. We take t to be the subalgebra of gl(N) consisting of the w∈gl(N) such that w(N)⊂M. For all w∈t, let η(w)∈gl(M) be the restriction of w to M and let ζ(w)=w(0,1)∈M. For w1∈t,w2∈t,
ζ([w1,w2])=w1(ζ(w2))−w2(ζ(w1))=η(w1)⋅ζ(w2)−η(w2)⋅ζ(w1).
Hence the mapping w↦(ζ(w)),η(w)) is a homomorphism θ of t into af(M). Clearly θ is bijective. Let ϕ=θ−1. If (m,u)∈af(M), ϕ(m,u) is the element w of t defined by
w(m′,λ)=(u(m′)+λm,0).
af(M) is often identified with the subalgebra t of gl(N) under the isomorphism ϕ.
When M is a finite-dimensional vector space over R, the homomorphism ϕ of af(M) into gl(N) corresponds to a canonical homomorphism ψ of the affine group A of M into the group GL(N); if a∈A,ψ(a) is the unique element g of GL(N) such that g(m,1)=(a(m),1) for all m∈M. This homomorphism is injective and ψ(A) is the set of automorphisms of N which leave invariant all the linear varieties of N parallel to M.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.