Bourbaki

Example 2

Tag 09U4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09U4].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter I, § 1. Definition of Lie algebras

Let gg be a Lie algebra over KK, MM a KK-module and ρ\rho a homomorphism of gg into gl(M)\mathfrak{gl}(M). If MM is considered as a commutative Lie algebra, the Lie algebra of derivations of MM is gl(M)\mathfrak{gl}(M). We can therefore form the semi-direct product hh of gg by MM corresponding to ρ\rho.

In particular, let g=gl(M)g = \mathfrak{gl}(M) and ρ\rho be the identity mapping of gl(M)\mathfrak{gl}(M). The semi-direct product of gg by MM is then denoted by af(M)\mathfrak{af}(M) (or af(n,K)\mathfrak{af}(n, K) if M=KnM = K^n). An element of af(M)\mathfrak{af}(M) is an ordered pair (m,u)(m, u), where m∈M,u∈gl(M)m \in M, u \in \mathfrak{gl}(M); and the bracket is defined by

[(m,u),(m′,u′)]=(u(m′)−u′(m),[u,u′]). [(m, u), (m', u')] = (u(m') - u'(m), [u, u']).

*When M is a finite-dimensional vector space over R\mathbf{R}, af(M)\mathfrak{af}(M) is canonically identified with the Lie algebra of the affine group of M.*

Let tt be a Lie algebra over K. A linear mapping θ\theta of tt into af(M)\mathfrak{af}(M) can be written x↦((ζ(x),η(x)))x \mapsto ((\zeta(x), \eta(x))), where ζ\zeta is a linear mapping of tt into MM and η\eta a linear mapping of tt into gl(M)gl(M). We examine the conditions that ζ\zeta and η\eta must satisfy for θ\theta to be a homomorphism. For x∈t,y∈tx \in t, y \in t, we must have

θ([x,y])=[θ(x),θ(y)] \theta([x, y]) = [\theta(x), \theta(y)]

that is

(ζ([x,y]),η([x,y]))=[(ζ(x),η(x)),(ζ(y),η(y))]=(η(x)⋅ζ(y)−η(y)⋅ζ(x),[η(x),η(y)]). (\zeta([x, y]), \eta([x, y])) = [(\zeta(x), \eta(x)), (\zeta(y), \eta(y))] \\ = (\eta(x) \cdot \zeta(y) - \eta(y) \cdot \zeta(x), [\eta(x), \eta(y)]).

Hence for θ\theta to be a homomorphism of tt into af(M)\mathfrak{af}(M), it is necessary and sufficient that η\eta be a homomorphism of tt into gl(M)gl(M) and that ζ\zeta satisfy the relation:

(13)

ζ([x,y])=η(x)⋅ζ(y)−η(y)⋅ζ(x). \zeta([x, y]) = \eta(x) \cdot \zeta(y) - \eta(y) \cdot \zeta(x).

Let N be the K-module M×KM \times K. We take tt to be the subalgebra of gl(N)gl(N) consisting of the w∈gl(N)w \in gl(N) such that w(N)⊂Mw(N) \subset M. For all w∈tw \in t, let η(w)∈gl(M)\eta(w) \in gl(M) be the restriction of ww to MM and let ζ(w)=w(0,1)∈M\zeta(w) = w(0, 1) \in M. For w1∈t,w2∈tw_1 \in t, w_2 \in t,

ζ([w1,w2])=w1(ζ(w2))−w2(ζ(w1))=η(w1)⋅ζ(w2)−η(w2)⋅ζ(w1). \zeta([w_1, w_2]) = w_1(\zeta(w_2)) - w_2(\zeta(w_1)) = \eta(w_1) \cdot \zeta(w_2) - \eta(w_2) \cdot \zeta(w_1).

Hence the mapping w↦(ζ(w)),η(w))w \mapsto (\zeta(w)), \eta(w)) is a homomorphism θ\theta of tt into af(M)\mathfrak{af}(M). Clearly θ\theta is bijective. Let ϕ=θ−1\phi = \theta^{-1}. If (m,u)∈af(M)(m, u) \in \mathfrak{af}(M), ϕ(m,u)\phi(m, u) is the element ww of tt defined by

w(m′,λ)=(u(m′)+λm,0). w(m', \lambda) = (u(m') + \lambda m, 0).

af(M)\mathfrak{af}(M) is often identified with the subalgebra tt of gl(N)gl(N) under the isomorphism ϕ\phi.

When M is a finite-dimensional vector space over R\mathbf{R}, the homomorphism ϕ\phi of af(M)\mathfrak{af}(M) into gl(N)gl(N) corresponds to a canonical homomorphism ψ\psi of the affine group A of M into the group GL(N)\mathbf{GL}(N); if a∈A,ψ(a)a \in A, \psi(a) is the unique element gg of GL(N)\mathbf{GL}(N) such that g(m,1)=(a(m),1)g(m, 1) = (a(m), 1) for all m∈Mm \in M. This homomorphism is injective and ψ(A)\psi(A) is the set of automorphisms of N which leave invariant all the linear varieties of N parallel to M.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.