Let h be an ideal of g, p the canonical homomorphism of g onto g/h and W the enveloping algebra of g/h. The homomorphism:
p~:U→W
defined canonically by p is surjective and its kernel is the ideal R of U generated by σ(h).
Let σ′′ be the canonical mapping of g/h into W. The commutative diagram:
h↓σ′Viιg↓σU
g↓σUpp~g/h↓σ′′W
proves that p~ is zero on σ(h) and hence on R. Let ψ be the canonical homomorphism of U onto U/R. There exists a homomorphism ϕ of U/R
g↓σUpψg/h↓σ′′U/R
U/RU/Rϕ′↑θ↑ϕϕWW
into W such that p~=ϕ∘ψ. The mapping ψ∘σ of g into U/R is an α-mapping and is zero on h and hence defines an α-mapping θ of g/h into U/R such that θ∘p=ψ∘σ. Then ϕ∘θ∘p=ϕ∘ψ∘σ=σ′′∘p. Hence ϕ∘θ=σ′′. There exists (no. 1, Proposition 1) one and only one homomorphism ϕ′ of W into U/R mapping 1 to 1 and such that θ=ϕ′∘σ′′. Then ϕ′∘ϕ∘θ=ϕ′∘σ′′=θ and ϕ∘ϕ′∘σ′′=ϕ∘θ=σ′′ and hence ϕ′∘ϕ and ϕ∘ϕ′ are the identity mappings of U/R and W respectively. This completes the proof.
U/R is identified with W under the isomorphism ϕ. Then the canonical mapping σ′′ of g/h into W is identified with θ, that is with the mapping of g/h into U/R derived from σ by taking quotients.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.