Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 0A6C, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A6C].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter II, § 6. The Hausdorff series

Let gg be a complete Hausdorff filtered Lie algebra such that g=⋃α>0gαg = \bigcup_{\alpha > 0} g_\alpha. The mapping (a,b)↦H(a,b)(a, b) \mapsto H(a, b) is a group law on gg compatible with the topology on gg under which 00 is the identity element and −a-a is the inverse of aa for all a∈ga \in g.

The mapping (a,b)↦H(a,b)(a, b) \mapsto H(a, b) of g×gg \times g into gg is continuous (no. 3); as the mapping a↦−aa \mapsto -a is obviously continuous, it suffices to prove the relations

(18)H(H(a,b),c)=H(a,H(b,c))(19)H(a,−a)=0(20)H(a,0)=H(0,a)=a \begin{align*} (18) \quad & H(H(a, b), c) = H(a, H(b, c)) \\ (19) \quad & H(a, -a) = 0 \\ (20) \quad & H(a, 0) = H(0, a) = a \end{align*}
for a,b,ca, b, c in gg. By formula (7) of no. 3, it suffices to prove these formulae when a,b,ca, b, c are three indeterminates and g=L^({a,b,c})g = \hat{L}(\{a, b, c\}). Now the restriction of the exponential mapping to L^({a,b,c})\hat{L}(\{a, b, c\}) is an injection into the Magnus algebra A^({a,b,c})\hat{A}(\{a, b, c\}) and by Proposition 3:
exp⁡H(H(a,b),c)=exp⁡H(a,b).exp⁡c=exp⁡a.exp⁡b.exp⁡cexp⁡H(a,H(b,c))=exp⁡a.exp⁡H(b,c)=exp⁡a.exp⁡b.exp⁡cexp⁡H(a,−a)=exp⁡a.exp⁡(−a)=exp⁡(a−a)=exp⁡0exp⁡H(a,0)=exp⁡a.exp⁡0=exp⁡aexp⁡H(0,a)=exp⁡0.exp⁡a=exp⁡a. \begin{align*} \exp H(H(a, b), c) &= \exp H(a, b) . \exp c = \exp a . \exp b . \exp c \\ \exp H(a, H(b, c)) &= \exp a . \exp H(b, c) = \exp a . \exp b . \exp c \\ \exp H(a, -a) &= \exp a . \exp(-a) = \exp(a - a) = \exp 0 \\ \exp H(a, 0) &= \exp a . \exp 0 = \exp a \\ \exp H(0, a) &= \exp 0 . \exp a = \exp a. \end{align*}
This establishes relations (18) to (20).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.