Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 0A6N, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A6N].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter II, § 7. Convergence of the Hausdorff series (real or complex case)

Let

Ω′={(x,y,z)∈g×g×g∣∥x∥+∥y∥+∥z∥<1Mlog⁡32}. \Omega' = \left\{ (x, y, z) \in g \times g \times g \mid \|x\| + \|y\| + \|z\| < \frac{1}{M} \log \frac{3}{2} \right\}.

If (x,y,z)∈Ω′(x, y, z) \in \Omega', then

(16)(x,y)∈Ω,(h(x,y),z)∈Ω,(y,z)∈Ω,(x,h(y,z))∈Ω \text{(16)} \quad (x, y) \in \Omega, \quad (h(x, y), z) \in \Omega, \quad (y, z) \in \Omega, \quad (x, h(y, z)) \in \Omega
and
(17)h(h(x,y),z)=h(x,h(y,z)). \text{(17)} \quad h(h(x, y), z) = h(x, h(y, z)).

Let (x,y,z)∈Ω′(x, y, z) \in \Omega'; clearly (x,y)∈Ω(x, y) \in \Omega and (y,z)∈Ω(y, z) \in \Omega. Moreover:

∥h(x,y)∥≤∑r,s∥Hr,s∥∥x∣r∥y∣s, \|h(x, y)\| \leq \sum_{r, s} \|H_{r,s}\| \|x|r\|y|s,

and hence by (13)

∥h(x,y)∥≤−1Mlog⁡(2−exp⁡M(∥x∥+∥y∥)). \|h(x, y)\| \leq -\frac{1}{M} \log(2 - \exp M(\|x\| + \|y\|)).

Now M(∥x∥+∥y∥)<log⁡32−M∥z∥M(\|x\| + \|y\|) < \log \frac{3}{2} - M\|z\|; we write u=exp⁡(M∥z∥)u = \exp(M\|z\|); then 1≤u≤321 \leq u \leq \frac{3}{2} and

M(∥h(x,y)∥+∥z∥)<−log⁡(2−exp⁡(log⁡32−M∥z∥))+M∥z∥=−log⁡(2−32u)+log⁡u=log⁡2u24u−3=log⁡(2+2(u−1)(u−3)4u−3)≤log⁡2. \begin{align*} M(\|h(x, y)\| + \|z\|) &< -\log(2 - \exp(\log \frac{3}{2} - M\|z\|)) + M\|z\| \\ &= -\log\left(2 - \frac{3}{2u}\right) + \log u = \log \frac{2u^2}{4u - 3} \\ &= \log\left(2 + \frac{2(u - 1)(u - 3)}{4u - 3}\right) \leq \log 2. \end{align*}

We see similarly that (x,h(y,z))∈Ω(x, h(y, z)) \in \Omega.

We now prove (17). In the Lie algebra L^({U,V,W})\hat{L}(\{U, V, W\}),

H(H(U,V),W)=H(U,H(V,W)) H(H(U, V), W) = H(U, H(V, W))

by Proposition 4 of § 6, no. 5. By no. 1, formula (2), we therefore have in P^(g×g×g,g)\hat{P}(g \times g \times g, g) the relation

H~∘(H~×Idg)=H~∘(Idg×H~). \tilde{H} \circ (\tilde{H} \times \mathrm{Id}_g) = \tilde{H} \circ (\mathrm{Id}_g \times \tilde{H}).

By Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 3.1.9, there exists a number ε>0\varepsilon > 0 such that formula (17) is true when ∥x∥,∥y∥\|x\|, \|y\| and ∥z∥\|z\| are ≤ε\leq \varepsilon. But the functions (x,y,z)↦h(h(x,y),z)(x, y, z) \mapsto h(h(x, y), z) and (x,y,z)↦h(x,h(y,z))(x, y, z) \mapsto h(x, h(y, z)) are analytic functions on Ω′\Omega' with values in gg (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 3.2.7). As Ω′\Omega' is connected and they coincide in a neighbourhood of 0, they are equal (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 3.2.5).

The above results imply:

Let α\alpha be a real number such that 0<α≤13Mlog⁡320 < \alpha \leq \frac{1}{3M} \log \frac{3}{2}. Let

G={x∈g∣∥x∥<α}, G = \{x \in g \mid \|x\| < \alpha\},

Θ={(x,y)∈G×G∣h(x,y)∈G} \Theta = \{(x, y) \in G \times G \mid h(x, y) \in G\}
and m:Θ→Gm : \Theta \to G be the restriction of hh to Θ\Theta. Then: (1) Θ\Theta is open in G×GG \times G and mm is analytic. (2) x∈Gx \in G implies (0,x)∈Θ(0, x) \in \Theta, (x,0)∈Θ(x, 0) \in \Theta and m(0,x)=m(x,0)=xm(0, x) = m(x, 0) = x. (3) x∈Gx \in G implies −x∈G-x \in G, (x,−x)∈Θ(x, -x) \in \Theta, (−x,x)∈Θ(-x, x) \in \Theta and

m(x,−x)=m(−x,x)=0. m(x, -x) = m(-x, x) = 0.

(4) Let x, y, z be elements of G such that (x, y) ∈ Θ, (m(x, y), z) ∈ Θ, (y, z) ∈ Θ and (x, m(y, z)) ∈ Θ. Then m(m(x, y), z) = m(x, m(y, z)).

In other words (Chapter III, § 1), if we write −x = σ(x), the quadruple (G, 0, σ, m) is a Lie group germ over K.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.