Bourbaki

Corollary 1

Tag 0ACS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ACS].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 4. Passage from Lie algebras to Lie groups

Let G be a Lie group. There exists a neighbourhood of e which contains no finite subgroup distinct from {e}. If K = R or C, there exists an open neighbourhood of e which contains no subgroup distinct from {e}.

We write L(G) = L. Choose a norm on L defining the topology on L and such that ∥[x,y]∥≤∥x∥∥y∥\| [x, y] \| \leq \| x \| \| y \| for all x, y in L.

Suppose that K = R or C. Let G' be the Lie group germ defined by L. There exist an open ball U' of centre 0 in G' and an isomorphism ϕ\phi of the Lie group germ U' onto an open neighbourhood U of e in G. Let V' = 12U′\frac{1}{2} U', V=ϕ(V′)V = \phi(V'), H be a subgroup of G contained in V and h∈Hh \in H. Let x=ϕ−1(h)∈V′x = \phi^{-1}(h) \in V'. If x≠0x \neq 0, there exists an integer n>0n > 0 such that x,2x,…,nxx, 2x, \ldots, nx are in V', (n+1)x∈U′(n+1)x \in U', (n+1)x∉V′(n+1)x \notin V'. Then h,h2,…,hnh, h^2, \ldots, h^n are in V,

hn+1∈U,hn+1∉V, h^{n+1} \in U, \qquad h^{n+1} \notin V,

which is absurd. Hence H = {e}.

Suppose that K is ultrametric. It suffices to prove the corollary when G is the Lie group associated with L. If g∈Gg \in G, the powers of g evaluated in G are the elements of Zg\mathbf{Z}g evaluated in L. These are distinct if g≠eg \neq e. Hence G contains no finite subgroup distinct from {e}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.