Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 0AD9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AD9].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 4. Passage from Lie algebras to Lie groups

Let G be a finite-dimensional Lie group, Ω\Omega a symmetric open neighbourhood of e in G and H a subset of Ω\Omega containing e such that the conditions x∈H,y∈H,xy−1∈Ωx \in H, y \in H, xy^{-1} \in \Omega imply xy−1∈Hxy^{-1} \in H. Let r∈NKr \in N_K. For all x∈Hx \in H, let hxh_x be the set of a∈Tx(G)a \in T_x(G) with the following property: there exist an open neighbourhood I of 0 in K and a mapping f of class CrC^r of I into G such that f(0)=x,f(I)⊂H,(T0f)(1)=af(0) = x, f(I) \subset H, (T_0f)(1) = a.

(i) Let he=hh_e = h. Then h is a Lie subalgebra of L(G)L(G) which is invariant under AdL(G)(H)\mathrm{Ad}_{L(G)}(H).

(ii) hx=xh=hxh_x = xh = hx for all x∈Hx \in H (where xhxh and hxhx are evaluated in T(G)T(G)).

(iii) Let V be a manifold of class CrC^r, v0v_0 a point of V and f a mapping of class CrC^r of V into G such that f(v0)=ef(v_0) = e and f(V)⊂Hf(V) \subset H. For every Lie subgroup germ H′H' of G with Lie algebra h, f(v)∈H′f(v) \in H' for v sufficiently close to v0v_0.

(iv) For every Lie subgroup germ H′H' of G with Lie algebra h, H′∩HH' \cap H is a neighbourhood of e in H′H'.

(v) For all x∈Hx \in H and all a∈hxa \in h_x, there exist an open neighbourhood I of 0 in K and a mapping f of class CaC^a of I into G such that f(0)=x,f(I)⊂H,(T0f)(1)=af(0) = x, f(I) \subset H, (T_0f)(1) = a. Clearly Kh=hKh = h and xhyz=hxyzxh_yz = h_{xyz} for x,y,xy,xyzx, y, xy, xyz in H. This implies (ii) and the fact that h is invariant under AdL(G)(H)\mathrm{Ad}_{L(G)}(H).

Let a1,a2a_1, a_2 be in h. Let I be an open neighbourhood of 0 in K and f1,f2f_1, f_2 mappings of class CrC^r of I into G such that fj(0)=e,fj(I)⊂H,(T0fj)(1)=ajf_j(0) = e, f_j(I) \subset H, (T_0f_j)(1) = a_j (j=1,2j = 1, 2). We define f:I→Gf : I \to G by f(λ)=f1(λ)f2(λ)f(\lambda) = f_1(\lambda)f_2(\lambda). Then f is of class CrC^r and f(0)=ef(0) = e. By shrinking I if necessary, we have f(I)⊂Hf(I) \subset H. On the other hand, the mapping of Te(G)×Te(G)T_e(G) \times T_e(G) into Te(G)T_e(G) tangent to the mapping (g,g′)→gg′(g, g') \to gg' is addition; hence (T0f)=a1+a2(T_0f) = a_1 + a_2. Hence a1+a2∈ha_1 + a_2 \in h and h is a vector subspace of L(G)L(G). Since xhx−1=hxhx^{-1} = h for all x∈Hx \in H, (Adf1(λ)).a2∈h(\mathrm{Ad}_{f_1(\lambda)}) . a_2 \in h for all λ∈I\lambda \in I. The tangent mapping at 0 to the mapping λ↦Adf1(λ)\lambda \mapsto \mathrm{Ad}f_1(\lambda) is, by Proposition 44 of § 3, no. 12, the mapping λ↦ad(a1λ)\lambda \mapsto \mathrm{ad}(a_1\lambda); hence

[a1,a2]=(ad a1).a2∈h [a_1, a_2] = (\mathrm{ad}\, a_1) . a_2 \in h

since h is closed in L(G)L(G). Hence we have proved (i). In the rest of the proof we fix a Lie subgroup germ H′H' of G with Lie algebra h.

Let V, v0,fv_0, f be as in (iii). Let Y be the left foliation of G associated with h (no. 1). For all y∈H′y \in H', Ty(H′)=yhT_y(H') = yh. On the other hand, for all v∈Vv \in V, the image of Tv(V)T_v(V) under Tv(f)T_v(f) is contained in hf(v)=f(v)hh_{f(v)} = f(v)h (by definition of hf(v)h_{f(v)}). By Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.3.2, f is a morphism of V into Y. As H′H' is a leaf of Y (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.2.8), f(v)∈H′f(v) \in H' for v sufficiently close to v0v_0.

Let (a1,…,as)(a_1, \ldots, a_s) be a basis of h. There exist an open neighbourhood I of 0 in K and mappings f1,…,fsf_1, \ldots, f_s of class CrC^r of I into G such that fj(0)=e,fj(I)⊂H,(Tfj)1=ajf_j(0) = e, f_j(I) \subset H, (Tf_j)1 = a_j for all j. By (iii), fj(λ)∈H′f_j(\lambda) \in H' for ∣λ∣|\lambda| sufficiently small. Hence the f1(λ1)f2(λ2)…fs(λs)f_1(\lambda_1)f_2(\lambda_2)\ldots f_s(\lambda_s) constitute, for ∣λ1∣,∣λ2∣,…,∣λs∣|\lambda_1|, |\lambda_2|, \ldots, |\lambda_s| sufficiently small, a neighbourhood of ee in H′H'; and this neighbourhood is contained in HH. Hence (iv).

If a∈ha \in \mathfrak{h}, there exist an open neighbourhood II of 00 in KK and a mapping ff of class CωC^\omega of II into GG such that f(0)=e,f(I)⊂H′,(T0f)1=af(0) = e, f(I) \subset H', (T_0 f)1 = a. This, with (iv), implies (v).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.