Lemma 4
Tag 0AD9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AD9].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 4. Passage from Lie algebras to Lie groups
Let G be a finite-dimensional Lie group, a symmetric open neighbourhood of e in G and H a subset of containing e such that the conditions imply . Let . For all , let be the set of with the following property: there exist an open neighbourhood I of 0 in K and a mapping f of class of I into G such that .
(i) Let . Then h is a Lie subalgebra of which is invariant under .
(ii) for all (where and are evaluated in ).
(iii) Let V be a manifold of class , a point of V and f a mapping of class of V into G such that and . For every Lie subgroup germ of G with Lie algebra h, for v sufficiently close to .
(iv) For every Lie subgroup germ of G with Lie algebra h, is a neighbourhood of e in .
(v) For all and all , there exist an open neighbourhood I of 0 in K and a mapping f of class of I into G such that . Clearly and for in H. This implies (ii) and the fact that h is invariant under .
Let be in h. Let I be an open neighbourhood of 0 in K and mappings of class of I into G such that (). We define by . Then f is of class and . By shrinking I if necessary, we have . On the other hand, the mapping of into tangent to the mapping is addition; hence . Hence and h is a vector subspace of . Since for all , for all . The tangent mapping at 0 to the mapping is, by Proposition 44 of § 3, no. 12, the mapping ; hence
since h is closed in . Hence we have proved (i). In the rest of the proof we fix a Lie subgroup germ of G with Lie algebra h.
Let V, be as in (iii). Let Y be the left foliation of G associated with h (no. 1). For all , . On the other hand, for all , the image of under is contained in (by definition of ). By Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.3.2, f is a morphism of V into Y. As is a leaf of Y (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.2.8), for v sufficiently close to .
Let be a basis of h. There exist an open neighbourhood I of 0 in K and mappings of class of I into G such that for all j. By (iii), for sufficiently small. Hence the constitute, for sufficiently small, a neighbourhood of in ; and this neighbourhood is contained in . Hence (iv).
If , there exist an open neighbourhood of in and a mapping of class of into such that . This, with (iv), implies (v).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.