Let G be a Lie group. There exists one and only one exponential mapping of G defined on L(G).
There exist a convex open neighbourhood U of 0 in L(G) and an exponential mapping of G defined on U. It can be assumed, by choosing U sufficiently small, that
ϕ((λ+λ′)a)=ϕ(λa)ϕ(λ′a)
for a∈L(G), λ,λ′ in K, λa,λ′a,(λ+λ′)a in U.
Let a∈L(G). There exists an integer n>0 such that n1a∈U. If m is another integer such that m1a∈U, then nm1a∈U and relation (1) implies
ϕ(n1a)=(ϕ(nm1a))m,ϕ(m1a)=(ϕ(nm1a))n;
hence (ϕ(n1a))n=(ϕ(m1a))m. There exists an extension ψ:L(G)→G of ϕ such that ψ(a)=(ϕ(n1a))n for a∈L(G) and n an integer >0 such that n1a∈U. Clearly ψ is analytic and is an exponential mapping of G. If ψ′:L(G)→G is an exponential mapping of G, ψ and ψ′ coincide on a neighbourhood of 0 and hence are equal since L(G) is connected.
Henceforth when we speak of the exponential mapping of G, we shall mean the mapping considered in Theorem 4. It will be denoted by expG or exp if there is no risk of confusion.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.