Bourbaki

Corollary 2

Tag 0AFP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AFP].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 6. Real and complex Lie groups

*Let G be a finite-dimensional simply connected Lie group, H a normal connected Lie subgroup of G and π\pi the canonical morphism of G onto G/H.

(i) There exists an analytic mapping φ\varphi of G/H into G such that π∘φ=IdG/H\pi \circ \varphi = \mathrm{Id}_{G/H}.

(ii) For every mapping φ\varphi with the properties of (i), the mapping (h,m)↦hφ(m)(h, m) \mapsto h \varphi(m) of H×(G/H)H \times (G/H) into G is an isomorphism of analytic manifolds.

(iii) H and G/H are simply connected.

Let n=dim⁡G−dim⁡Hn = \dim G - \dim H. The corollary is obvious for n=0n = 0. We argue by induction on n.

Suppose that there exists an ideal of L(G) containing L(H) distinct from L(G) and L(H). Let H' be the corresponding connected Lie subgroup of G. Let π1:G→G/H′\pi_1 : G \to G/H' and π2:H′→H′/H\pi_2 : H' \to H'/H be the canonical morphisms. By the induction hypothesis, there exist analytic mappings ρ1:G/H′→G\rho_1 : G/H' \to G, ρ2:H′/H→H′\rho_2 : H'/H \to H' such that π1∘ρ1=IdG/H′\pi_1 \circ \rho_1 = \mathrm{Id}_{G/H'}, π2∘ρ2=IdH′/H\pi_2 \circ \rho_2 = \mathrm{Id}_{H'/H}. Let

π3:G/H→G/H′ \pi_3 : G/H \to G/H'

be the canonical morphism. If x∈G/Hx \in G/H and y is a representative of x in G, y and ρ1(π3(x))\rho_1(\pi_3(x)) have the same canonical image modulo H' and hence x−1π(ρ1(π3(x)))∈H′/Hx^{-1} \pi(\rho_1(\pi_3(x))) \in H'/H. Let

ρ(x)=ρ1(π3(x))ρ2(π(ρ1(π3(x))))−1x∈G. \rho(x) = \rho_1(\pi_3(x)) \rho_2(\pi(\rho_1(\pi_3(x))))^{-1} x \in G.

Clearly ρ\rho is an analytic mapping of G/H into G and

π(ρ(x))=π(ρ1(π3(x)))π2(ρ2(π(ρ1(π3(x))))−1x))=π(ρ1(π3(x)))π(ρ1(π3(x)))−1x=x. \pi(\rho(x)) = \pi(\rho_1(\pi_3(x))) \pi_2(\rho_2(\pi(\rho_1(\pi_3(x))))^{-1} x)) \\ = \pi(\rho_1(\pi_3(x))) \pi(\rho_1(\pi_3(x)))^{-1} x = x.

If now the only ideals of L(G) containing L(H) are L(G) and L(H), the Lie algebra L(G)/L(H)L(G)/L(H) is either 1-dimensional or simple. In both cases, L(G)L(G) is the semi-direct product of a subalgebra by L(H)L(H); this is obvious in the first case and in the second this follows from Chapter I, § 6, Corollary 3 to Theorem 5. Assertion (i) then follows from Corollary 1.

Assertion (ii) is obvious. Assertion (iii) follows from (i) and (ii).

The conclusions of Corollary 2 are no longer necessarily true when G is infinite-dimensional or when H is not normal (Exercises 8 and 15).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.