Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 0ALC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ALC].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 10. The automorphism group of a Lie group

Let GG and G′G' be Lie groups and ϕ\phi a homomorphism of GG into Aut(G′)\mathrm{Aut}(G'). Let f(g,g′)=(ϕ(g))(g′)f(g, g') = (\phi(g))(g') for g∈G,g′∈G′g \in G, g' \in G'. Consider the following conditions: (i) ff is analytic; (ii) ff is analytic in a neighbourhood of (eG,eG′)(e_G, e_{G'}); (iii) for all g′∈G′g' \in G', the mapping g↦f(g,g′)g \mapsto f(g, g') is analytic. Then (i) ⇔\Leftrightarrow ((ii) and (iii)). If GG is connected, (i) ⇔\Leftrightarrow (ii). Clearly (i) implies (ii) and (iii). Let g0∈G,g0′∈G′g_0 \in G, g_0' \in G'. For all g∈G,g′∈G′g \in G, g' \in G',

f(gg0,g′g0′)=(ϕ(g)ϕ(g0))(g′g0′)=ϕ(g)(ϕ(g0)g′).ϕ(g)(ϕ(g0)g0′). f(gg_0, g'g_0') = (\phi(g)\phi(g_0))(g'g_0') = \phi(g)(\phi(g_0)g').\phi(g)(\phi(g_0)g_0').

This proves the implication ((ii) and (iii)) ⇒\Rightarrow (i). Finally, if G′G' is connected, G′G' is generated by every neighbourhood of eG′e_{G'} and hence (ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (iii).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.