Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 0AM1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AM1].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IV, § 1. Coxeter Groups

(i) Let w∈Ww \in W and t∈Tt \in T. The number (−1)n(s,t)(-1)^{n(s, t)} has the same value η(w,t)\eta(w, t) for all sequences s=(s1,…,sq)s = (s_1, \ldots, s_q) of elements of S such that w=s1…sqw = s_1 \ldots s_q.

(ii) For w∈Ww \in W, let UwU_w be the map from R to itself defined by

Uw(ε,t)=(ε⋅η(w−1,t),wtw−1)(ε=±1,t∈T). U_w(\varepsilon, t) = (\varepsilon \cdot \eta(w^{-1}, t), wtw^{-1}) \quad (\varepsilon = \pm 1, t \in T).

The map w↦Uww \mapsto U_w is a homomorphism from W to the group of permutations of R.

(2) Recall that two elements (resp. two subsets) of a group W are said to be conjugate if there exists an inner automorphism of W that transforms one into the other.

For s∈Ss \in S, define a map UsU_s from RR to itself by

Us(ε,t)=(ε.(−1)δs,t,sts−1)(ε=±1,t∈T), U_s(\varepsilon, t) = (\varepsilon.(-1)^{\delta_{s,t}}, st s^{-1}) \quad (\varepsilon = \pm 1, t \in T),
where δs,t\delta_{s,t} is the Kronecker symbol. It is immediate that Us2=IdRU_s^2 = \mathrm{Id}_R, which shows that UsU_s is a permutation of RR.

Let s=(s1,…,sq)s = (s_1, \ldots, s_q) be a sequence of elements of SS. Put w=sq…s1w = s_q \ldots s_1 and Us=Usq…Us1U_s = U_{s_q} \ldots U_{s_1}. We shall show, by induction on qq, that

Us(ε,t)=(ε.(−1)n(s,t),wtw−1). U_s(\varepsilon, t) = (\varepsilon.(-1)^{n(s,t)}, wt w^{-1}).
This is clear for q=0,1q = 0, 1. If q>1q > 1, put s′=(s1,…,sq−1)s' = (s_1, \ldots, s_{q-1}) and
w′=sq−1…s1. w' = s_{q-1} \ldots s_1.
Using the induction hypothesis, we obtain
Us(ε,t)=Usq(Usq(ε.(−1)n(s′,t),w′tw′−1))=(ε.(−1)n(s′,t)+δsq,w′tw′−1,wtw−1). \begin{align*} U_s(\varepsilon, t) &= U_{s_q}(U_{s_q}(\varepsilon.(-1)^{n(s',t)}, w't {w'}^{-1})) \\ &= (\varepsilon.(-1)^{n(s',t)+\delta_{s_q,w't {w'}^{-1}}}, wt w^{-1}). \end{align*}
But Φ(s)=(Φ(s′),w′−1sqw′)\Phi(s) = (\Phi(s'), {w'}^{-1} s_q w') and n(s,t)=n(s′,t)+δw′,−1sqw′,tn(s, t) = n(s', t) + \delta_{w', -1} s_q w', t, proving formula (14).

Now let s,s′∈Ss, s' \in S be such that p=ss′p = ss' has finite order mm. Let s=(s1,…,s2m)s = (s_1, \ldots, s_{2m}) be the sequence of elements of SS defined by sj=ss_j = s for jj odd and sj=s′s_j = s' for jj even. Then s2m…s1=p−m=1s_{2m} \ldots s_1 = p^{-m} = 1 and formula (11) implies that

tj=pj−1sfor 1≤j≤2m. t_j = p^{j-1} s \quad \text{for } 1 \leq j \leq 2m.
Since pp is of order mm, the elements t1,…,tmt_1, \ldots, t_m are distinct and tj+m=tjt_{j+m} = t_j for 1≤j≤m1 \leq j \leq m. For all t∈Tt \in T, the integer n(s,t)n(s, t) is thus equal to 0 or 2 and (14) shows that Us=IdRU_s = \mathrm{Id}_R. In other words, (UsUs′)m=IdR(U_s U_{s'})^m = \mathrm{Id}_R. Thus, by the definition of Coxeter systems, there exists a homomorphism w↦Uww \mapsto U_w from WW to the group of permutations of RR such that UsU_s is given by the right-hand side of (13). Then Uw=UsU_w = U_s for every sequence s=(s1,…,sq)s = (s_1, \ldots, s_q) such that w=sq…s1w = s_q \ldots s_1 and Lemma 1 follows immediately from (14).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.