(i) Let w∈W and t∈T. The number (−1)n(s,t) has the same value η(w,t) for all sequences s=(s1,…,sq) of elements of S such that w=s1…sq.
(ii) For w∈W, let Uw be the map from R to itself defined by
Uw(ε,t)=(ε⋅η(w−1,t),wtw−1)(ε=±1,t∈T).
The map w↦Uw is a homomorphism from W to the group of permutations of R.
(2) Recall that two elements (resp. two subsets) of a group W are said to be conjugate if there exists an inner automorphism of W that transforms one into the other.
For s∈S, define a map Us from R to itself by
Us(ε,t)=(ε.(−1)δs,t,sts−1)(ε=±1,t∈T), where
δs,t is the Kronecker symbol. It is immediate that
Us2=IdR, which shows that
Us is a permutation of
R.
Let s=(s1,…,sq) be a sequence of elements of S. Put w=sq…s1 and Us=Usq…Us1. We shall show, by induction on q, that
Us(ε,t)=(ε.(−1)n(s,t),wtw−1). This is clear for
q=0,1. If
q>1, put
s′=(s1,…,sq−1) and
w′=sq−1…s1. Using the induction hypothesis, we obtain
Us(ε,t)=Usq(Usq(ε.(−1)n(s′,t),w′tw′−1))=(ε.(−1)n(s′,t)+δsq,w′tw′−1,wtw−1). But
Φ(s)=(Φ(s′),w′−1sqw′) and
n(s,t)=n(s′,t)+δw′,−1sqw′,t, proving formula (14).
Now let s,s′∈S be such that p=ss′ has finite order m. Let s=(s1,…,s2m) be the sequence of elements of S defined by sj=s for j odd and sj=s′ for j even. Then s2m…s1=p−m=1 and formula (11) implies that
tj=pj−1sfor 1≤j≤2m. Since
p is of order
m, the elements
t1,…,tm are distinct and
tj+m=tj for
1≤j≤m. For all
t∈T, the integer
n(s,t) is thus equal to 0 or 2 and (14) shows that
Us=IdR. In other words,
(UsUs′)m=IdR. Thus, by the definition of Coxeter systems, there exists a homomorphism
w↦Uw from
W to the group of permutations of
R such that
Us is given by the right-hand side of (13). Then
Uw=Us for every sequence
s=(s1,…,sq) such that
w=sq…s1 and Lemma 1 follows immediately from (14).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.