Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 0AVA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AVA].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VI, § 1. Root systems

Let γ\gamma be a linear combination of roots with integer coefficients, and α\alpha an indivisible root. If γ\gamma is proportional to α\alpha, then γ∈Zα\gamma \in \mathbf{Z}\alpha.

By Prop. 15 of no. 5, CC can be chosen so that α∈B(C)\alpha \in B(C). By Th. 3,

γ=∑β∈B(C)nββwithnβ∈Z. \gamma = \sum_{\beta \in B(C)} n_{\beta} \beta \quad \text{with} \quad n_{\beta} \in \mathbf{Z}.
Thus, if γ\gamma is proportional to α\alpha, then γ=nαα\gamma = n_{\alpha} \alpha, which proves the corollary.

Now let SS be the set of reflections sαs_{\alpha} for α∈B(C)\alpha \in B(C) and let TT be the union of the conjugates of SS under WW. For α∈B(C)\alpha \in B(C) and w∈Ww \in W, the element t=wsαw−1t = ws_{\alpha}w^{-1} of TT is the orthogonal reflection sβs_{\beta} associated to the root β=w(α)\beta = w(\alpha); conversely, for any indivisible root β\beta, there exists an element w∈Ww \in W such that α=w−1(β)∈B(C)\alpha = w^{-1}(\beta) \in B(C) (Prop. 15) and sβ=wsαw−1∈Ts_{\beta} = ws_{\alpha}w^{-1} \in T. It follows that a bijection ψ\psi from the set of indivisible roots to {±1}×T\{\pm 1\} \times T is obtained by associating to an indivisible root β\beta the pair (ε,sβ)(\varepsilon, s_{\beta}), where ε=+1\varepsilon = +1 if β\beta is positive and ε=−1\varepsilon = -1 if β\beta is negative.

On the other hand, (W,S)(W, S) is a Coxeter system (Th. 2) and the results of Chap. IV, § 1, no. 4 can be applied. We have seen that, if ww is an element of WW of length (with respect to SS) equal to qq, there exists a subset TwT_w of TT, with qq elements, such that, if w=s1…sqw = s_1 \ldots s_q with si∈Ss_i \in S and if

ti=s1…si−1sisi−1…s1 t_i = s_1 \ldots s_{i-1} s_i s_{i-1} \ldots s_1
(for 1≤i≤q1 \leq i \leq q), then Tw={t1,…,tq}T_w = \{t_1, \ldots, t_q\}. Recall that we have also defined in no. 4 of § 1 a number η(w,t)\eta(w, t) (for w∈Ww \in W and t∈Tt \in T) equal to +1+1 if t∉Twt \notin T_w and to −1-1 if t∈Twt \in T_w. Finally, recall that, if we define a map UwU_w from the set {±1}×T\{\pm 1\} \times T to itself by the formula
Uw(ε,t)=(εη(w−1,t),wtw−1), U_w(\varepsilon, t) = (\varepsilon \eta(w^{-1}, t), wt w^{-1}),
the map w↦Uww \mapsto U_w is a homomorphism from WW to the group of permutations of the set {±1}×T\{\pm 1\} \times T (Chap. IV, § 1, no. 4, Lemma 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.