Let w∈W have length q≥1, let D be the set of reduced decompositions of w, and let F be a map from D to a set E. Assume that F(s)=F(s′) if the elements s=(s1,…,sq);s′=(s1′,…,sq′) of D satisfy one of the following hypotheses:
a) s1=s1′ or sq=sq′. b) There exist s and s′ in S such that sj=sk′=s and sk=sj′=s′ for j odd and k even.
Then F is constant.
A) Let s,s′∈D and put t=(s1′,s1,…,sq−1). We are going to show that if F(s)=F(s′) then t∈D and F(t)=F(s). Indeed, w=s1′…sq′ and hence s1′w=s2′…sq′ is of length <q. By Prop. 4, there exists an integer j such that 1≤j≤q and the sequence u=(s1′,s1,…,sj−1,sj+1,…,sq) belongs to D. We have F(u)=F(s′) by condition a); if j=q we would have F(s)=F(u) for the same reason, and hence F(s)=F(s′) contrary to our hypothesis. Thus j=q and hence t=u∈D and F(t)=F(s′)=F(s).
B) Let s and s′ belong to D. For any integer j with 0≤j≤q+1 define a sequence sj of q elements of S as follows:
s0=(s1′,…,sq′) s1=(s1,…,sq) sq+1−k=(s1,s1′,…,s1,s1′,s1,s2,…,sk) for
q−k even and
0≤k≤q sq+1−k=(s1′,s1,…,s1,s1′,s1,s2,…,sk) for
q−k odd and
0≤k≤q.
Denote by (H_j) the assertion "s_j \in D, s_{j+1} \in D \text{ and } F(s_j) \neq F(s_{j+1})". By A), (H_j) \implies (H_{j+1}) for 0≤j<q, and (H_q) is not satisfied by condition b). Hence, (H_0) is not satisfied. Since s0=s′ and s1=s, it follows that F(s)=F(s′).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.