Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 0AM6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AM6].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IV, § 1. Coxeter Groups

Let w∈Ww \in W have length q≥1q \geq 1, let D be the set of reduced decompositions of ww, and let F be a map from D to a set E. Assume that F(s)=F(s′)F(s) = F(s') if the elements s=(s1,…,sq);s′=(s1′,…,sq′)s = (s_1, \ldots, s_q); s' = (s'_1, \ldots, s'_q) of D satisfy one of the following hypotheses:

a) s1=s1′s_1 = s'_1 or sq=sq′s_q = s'_q. b) There exist s and s′s' in S such that sj=sk′=ss_j = s'_k = s and sk=sj′=s′s_k = s'_j = s' for jj odd and kk even.

Then F is constant.

A) Let s,s′∈Ds, s' \in D and put t=(s1′,s1,…,sq−1)t = (s'_1, s_1, \ldots, s_{q-1}). We are going to show that if F(s)≠F(s′)F(s) \neq F(s') then t∈Dt \in D and F(t)≠F(s)F(t) \neq F(s). Indeed, w=s1′…sq′w = s'_1 \ldots s'_q and hence s1′w=s2′…sq′s'_1 w = s'_2 \ldots s'_q is of length <q< q. By Prop. 4, there exists an integer jj such that 1≤j≤q1 \leq j \leq q and the sequence u=(s1′,s1,…,sj−1,sj+1,…,sq)u = (s'_1, s_1, \ldots, s_{j-1}, s_{j+1}, \ldots, s_q) belongs to D. We have F(u)=F(s′)F(u) = F(s') by condition a); if j≠qj \neq q we would have F(s)=F(u)F(s) = F(u) for the same reason, and hence F(s)=F(s′)F(s) = F(s') contrary to our hypothesis. Thus j=qj = q and hence t=u∈Dt = u \in D and F(t)=F(s′)≠F(s)F(t) = F(s') \neq F(s).

B) Let s and s′s' belong to D. For any integer jj with 0≤j≤q+10 \leq j \leq q + 1 define a sequence sjs_j of q elements of S as follows:

s0=(s1′,…,sq′) s_0 = (s'_1, \ldots, s'_q)
s1=(s1,…,sq) s_1 = (s_1, \ldots, s_q)
sq+1−k=(s1,s1′,…,s1,s1′,s1,s2,…,sk) s_{q+1-k} = (s_1, s'_1, \ldots, s_1, s'_1, s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_k)
for q−kq - k even and 0≤k≤q0 \leq k \leq q
sq+1−k=(s1′,s1,…,s1,s1′,s1,s2,…,sk) s_{q+1-k} = (s'_1, s_1, \ldots, s_1, s'_1, s_1, s_2, \ldots, s_k)
for q−kq - k odd and 0≤k≤q0 \leq k \leq q.

Denote by (H_j) the assertion "s_j \in D, s_{j+1} \in D \text{ and } F(s_j) \neq F(s_{j+1})". By A), (H_j) \implies (H_{j+1}) for 0≤j<q0 \leq j < q, and (H_q) is not satisfied by condition b). Hence, (H_0) is not satisfied. Since s0=s′s_0 = s' and s1=ss_1 = s, it follows that F(s)=F(s′)F(s) = F(s').

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.