If a(s,s′)=a(s′,s) whenever s=s′ are in S, there exists a map g from W to M such that
g(w)=f(s1)…f(sq)
for all w∈W and any reduced decomposition (s1,…,sq) of w.
For any w∈W, let Dw be the set of reduced decompositions of w and Fw the map from Dw to M defined by
Fw(s1,…,sq)=f(s1)…f(sq).
We are going to prove by induction on the length of w that Fw is constant, which will establish Prop. 5. The cases l(w)=0,1 being trivial, we assume that q≥2 and that our assertion is proved for the elements w with l(w)<q. Let w be of length q and s,s′∈Dw; by Lemma 4 it suffices to prove that Fw(s)=Fw(s′) in cases a) and b) of that lemma.
for w′=s1…sq−1 and w′′=s2…sq and the induction hypothesis show that Fw(s)=Fw(s′) if s1=s1′ or sq=sq′.
b) Suppose that there exist two elements s and s' of S such that sj=sk′=s and sk=sj′=s′ for j odd and k even. It suffices to treat the case s=s′. The sequences s and s' are then two distinct reduced decompositions of w in the dihedral group generated by s and s'. By the Remark in no. 2, the order m of ss' is necessarily finite and, in the notation of that remark, s=sm and s′=sm′. Consequently, Fw(s)=a(s,s′) and Fw(s′)=a(s′,s) and hence
Fw(s)=Fw(s′).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.