Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 0AM7, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AM7].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IV, § 1. Coxeter Groups

Let M be a monoid (with unit element 1) and f a map from S to M. For s, s' \in S, let m(s, s') be the order of ss' and put

a(s,s′)={(f(s)f(s′))lif m(s,s′)=2l,l finite(f(s)f(s′))lf(s)if m(s,s′)=2l+1,l finite1if m(s,s′)=∞. a(s, s') = \begin{cases} (f(s)f(s'))^l & \text{if } m(s, s') = 2l, l \text{ finite} \\ (f(s)f(s'))^lf(s) & \text{if } m(s, s') = 2l + 1, l \text{ finite} \\ 1 & \text{if } m(s, s') = \infty. \end{cases}

If a(s,s′)=a(s′,s)a(s, s') = a(s', s) whenever s≠s′s \neq s' are in S, there exists a map g from W to M such that

g(w)=f(s1)…f(sq) g(w) = f(s_1) \ldots f(s_q)
for all w∈Ww \in W and any reduced decomposition (s1,…,sq)(s_1, \ldots, s_q) of w.

For any w∈Ww \in W, let DwD_w be the set of reduced decompositions of w and FwF_w the map from DwD_w to M defined by

Fw(s1,…,sq)=f(s1)…f(sq). F_w(s_1, \ldots, s_q) = f(s_1) \ldots f(s_q).
We are going to prove by induction on the length of w that FwF_w is constant, which will establish Prop. 5. The cases l(w)=0,1l(w) = 0, 1 being trivial, we assume that q≥2q \geq 2 and that our assertion is proved for the elements w with l(w)<ql(w) < q. Let w be of length q and s,s′∈Dws, s' \in D_w; by Lemma 4 it suffices to prove that Fw(s)=Fw(s′)F_w(s) = F_w(s') in cases a) and b) of that lemma.

a) The formula

Fw(s1,…,sq)=f(s1)Fw′′(s2,…,sq)=Fw′(s1,…,sq−1)f(sq) F_w(s_1, \ldots, s_q) = f(s_1)F_{w''}(s_2, \ldots, s_q) = F_{w'}(s_1, \ldots, s_{q-1})f(s_q)
for w′=s1…sq−1w' = s_1 \ldots s_{q-1} and w′′=s2…sqw'' = s_2 \ldots s_q and the induction hypothesis show that Fw(s)=Fw(s′)F_w(s) = F_w(s') if s1=s1′s_1 = s'_1 or sq=sq′s_q = s'_q.

b) Suppose that there exist two elements s and s' of S such that sj=sk′=ss_j = s'_k = s and sk=sj′=s′s_k = s'_j = s' for j odd and k even. It suffices to treat the case s≠s′s \neq s'. The sequences s and s' are then two distinct reduced decompositions of w in the dihedral group generated by s and s'. By the Remark in no. 2, the order m of ss' is necessarily finite and, in the notation of that remark, s=sms = s_m and s′=sm′s' = s'_m. Consequently, Fw(s)=a(s,s′)F_w(s) = a(s, s') and Fw(s′)=a(s′,s)F_w(s') = a(s', s) and hence

Fw(s)=Fw(s′). F_w(s) = F_w(s').

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.