Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 0AP6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AP6].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 1. Hyperplanes, chambers and facets

Let F be a facet, and let L be an affine subspace of E that is the intersection of hyperplanes belonging to H\mathfrak{H}; denote by N\mathfrak{N} the set of hyperplanes H∈HH \in \mathfrak{H} that do not contain L. The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) There exists a facet F' with support L that meets F‾\overline{F}. (ii) There exists a facet F' with support L contained in F‾\overline{F}. (iii) There exists a point x in L∩F‾L \cap \overline{F} that does not belong to any of the hyperplanes of N\mathfrak{N}.

If these conditions are satisfied, L∩DN(F)L \cap D_{\mathfrak{N}}(F) is the unique facet with support LL contained in F‾\overline{F}.

(i) ⟹\Longrightarrow (ii): Since F‾\overline{F} is a union of facets (Prop. 3, (ii)), every facet that meets F‾\overline{F} meets a facet contained in F‾\overline{F}, and so is equal to it.

(ii) ⟹\Longrightarrow (iii): Every point xx of F′F' satisfies (iii) since every hyperplane of H\mathfrak{H} containing xx contains F′F', and hence LL.

(iii) ⟹\Longrightarrow (i): Let xx be a point satisfying (iii) and let F′F' be the facet containing xx; it is clear that F′F' meets F‾\overline{F}. Let H∈HH \in \mathfrak{H}; then x∉Hx \notin H if H∈NH \in \mathfrak{N} and clearly x∈Hx \in H if H∉NH \notin \mathfrak{N}; consequently the support of F′F' is the intersection of the hyperplanes of H−N\mathfrak{H} - \mathfrak{N}, and is equal to LL.

Finally, let F′F' be a facet with support LL contained in F‾\overline{F}, and let xx be a point of F′F'; since no hyperplane of N⊂H\mathfrak{N} \subset \mathfrak{H} passes through xx, Prop. 1 shows that there exists a convex open neighbourhood UU of xx that does not meet any hyperplane of N\mathfrak{N}. Since xx is in the closure of FF, U∩F≠∅U \cap F \neq \varnothing; now N\mathfrak{N} is the set of hyperplanes H∈HH \in \mathfrak{H} that do not contain F′F', and for all HH in N\mathfrak{N} we have DH(x)=DH(U)=DH(U∩F)=DH(F)D_H(x) = D_H(U) = D_H(U \cap F) = D_H(F) and formula (2) implies that

F′=L∩DN(F). F' = L \cap D_{\mathfrak{N}}(F).

Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.