Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0AP4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AP4].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 1. Hyperplanes, chambers and facets

Let F be a facet and L its affine support.

(i) The set F is a convex open subset of the affine subspace L of E. (ii) The closure of F is the union of F and facets of dimension strictly smaller than that of F. (iii) In the topological space L, the set F is the interior of its closure.

Since every open half-space and every hyperplane are convex subsets of E, formula (2) shows that F is the intersection of a family of convex subsets, and hence is convex. On the other hand, let a be in F, and let U be a convex open neighbourhood of a in E that does not meet any of the hyperplanes in the set N\mathfrak{N} of H∈HH \in \mathfrak{H} such that a∉Ha \notin H. For any H∈NH \in \mathfrak{N}, we thus have U⊂DH(a)U \subset D_H(a), hence L∩U⊂FL \cap U \subset F, so that F is open in the topological space L.

Let b be a point of F‾−F\overline{F} - F, belonging to a facet F′F', and let N′\mathfrak{N}' be the set of hyperplanes H∈NH \in \mathfrak{N} passing through b; put N′′=N−N′\mathfrak{N}'' = \mathfrak{N} - \mathfrak{N}'. For any H in N′′\mathfrak{N}'', we have b∉Hb \notin H and b∈DH(a)b \in D_H(a), hence b∈DH(a)b \in D_H(a) and DH(b)=DH(a)D_H(b) = D_H(a); by the definition of a facet, we thus have

F′=L∩⋂H∈N′H∩⋂H∈N′′DH(a), F' = L \cap \bigcap_{H \in \mathfrak{N}'} H \cap \bigcap_{H \in \mathfrak{N}''} D_H(a),

whereas (3) implies that

F‾=L∩⋂H∈N′DH(a)‾∩⋂H∈N′′DH(a)‾, \overline{F} = L \cap \bigcap_{H \in \mathfrak{N}'} \overline{D_H(a)} \cap \bigcap_{H \in \mathfrak{N}''} \overline{D_H(a)},

hence F′⊂F‾F' \subset \overline{F}. We cannot have N′=∅\mathfrak{N}' = \varnothing, for this would imply that F=F′F = F' by (2) and (4), contrary to the hypothesis that b∉Fb \notin F and b∈F′b \in F'. The support of F′F' is the set L′=L∩⋂H∈N′HL' = L \cap \bigcap_{H \in \mathfrak{N}'} H; we have a∈La \in L, but a∉Ha \notin H for HH in N′\mathfrak{N}', so L′≠LL' \neq L and finally dim⁡L′<dim⁡L\dim L' < \dim L, that is dim⁡F′<dim⁡F\dim F' < \dim F. This proves (ii).

Let H be in N′\mathfrak{N}' and let D be the open half-space bounded by H and distinct from DH(a)D_H(a); we have b∈H∩Lb \in H \cap L, and it is immediate that D∩LD \cap L is a half-space of L bounded by the hyperplane H∩LH \cap L of L; consequently, every neighbourhood of b in L meets D∩LD \cap L, and since D∩LD \cap L is disjoint from F‾\overline{F} by (3), we see that the point b of F‾−F\overline{F} - F cannot be in the interior of F‾\overline{F} in the topological space L. Since F is open in L, we have (iii). Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.