Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0AQ3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AQ3].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 3. Groups of displacements generated by reflections

Let C be a chamber. (i) For any x ∈ E, there exists an element w ∈ W such that w(x) ∈ C‾\overline{C}. (ii) For any chamber C', there is an element w ∈ W such that w(C') = C. (iii) The group W is generated by the set of orthogonal reflections with respect to the walls of C.

Let M be the set of walls of C and let W_M be the subgroup of W generated by the reflections with respect to the walls of C.

(i) Let x ∈ E and let J be the orbit of x under the group W_M. It suffices to prove that J meets C‾\overline{C}.

Let a be a point of C; there is a closed ball B with centre a meeting J; since B is compact, property (D'2) of no. 1 shows that B ∩ J is finite. Hence, there exists a point y of J such that

d(a,y)≤d(a,y′)for all y′ in J. d(a, y) \leq d(a, y') \quad \text{for all } y' \text{ in } J.

We shall prove that y ∈ C‾\overline{C}. For this, it suffices to show that if H is a wall of C then y ∈ D_H(C) (cf. §1§ 1, no. 4, Prop. 9). Since s_H ∈ W_M, we have s_H(y) ∈ J and so (fig. 1)

d(a,y)2≤d(a,sH(y))2 d(a, y)^2 \leq d(a, s_H(y))^2

by (1). There exist b ∈ H and two vectors t and u such that a = b + t and y = b + u, the vector u being orthogonal to H; then s_H(y) = b − u, and (2) is equivalent to (t−u∣t−u)≤(t+u∣t+u)(t-u|t-u) \leq (t+u|t+u), or to (t∣u)≥0(t|u) \geq 0. This inequality implies that y∈DH(C)y \in D_H(C).

![Diagram showing points a, b, y and a line labeled s_H(y)](Fig. 1)

(ii) Let C′C' be a chamber and a′∈C′a' \in C'. By what we have proved, there exists w∈Wmw \in W_{\mathfrak{m}} such that w−1(a′)∈C‾w^{-1}(a') \in \overline{C}; hence, the chamber C′C' meets w(C)w(C); since w(C)w(C) is the union of w(C)w(C) and facets with empty interior (§ 1, no. 2, Prop. 3), we have C′=w(C)C' = w(C).

(iii) We have to prove that W=WmW = W_{\mathfrak{m}} and for this it suffices to prove that sH′∈Wms_{H'} \in W_{\mathfrak{m}} for all H′∈HH' \in \mathfrak{H}. Now H′H' is a wall of at least one chamber C′C' (§ 1, no. 4, Prop. 8); we have seen that there exists w∈Wmw \in W_{\mathfrak{m}} such that C′=w(C)C' = w(C); consequently, there exists a wall HH of CC such that H′=w(H)H' = w(H), hence sH′=w.sH.w−1∈Wms_{H'} = w.s_H.w^{-1} \in W_{\mathfrak{m}}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.