Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 0AT2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AT2].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 5. Invariants in the symmetric algebra

Let K be a commutative field, V a finite dimensional vector space over K, G a finite group of automorphisms of V whose order q is invertible in K, S the symmetric algebra of V, and R the subalgebra of S consisting of the elements invariant under G. A prime ideal B of height 1 of S is ramified over p=B∩Rp = B \cap R (Commutative Algebra) if and only if there exist a non-zero element a of V and a non-zero element f of V∗V^* such that B=SaB = Sa and the pseudo-reflection sa,fs_{a,f} belongs to G. The decomposition group GZ(B)G^Z(B) is then the subgroup of elements of G leaving Ka stable, and the inertia group GT(B)G^T(B) is the cyclic subgroup HaH_a of G consisting of the pseudo-reflections of G with vector a. The residue field S(B) of S at B is separable over the residue field R(p)R(p) of R at p, and the ramification index e(B/p)e(B/p), equal to the coefficient of B, augmented by 1, in the divisor div⁡(DS/R)\operatorname{div}(D_{S/R}) of the different, is equal to Card⁡(Ha)\operatorname{Card}(H_a).

To say that B is ramified over R means that its inertia group GT(B)G^T(B) does not reduce to the identity, in other words that there exists g≠1g \neq 1 in G such that g(z)≡z(modB)g(z) \equiv z \pmod{B} for all z∈Sz \in S. Since S is a factorial ring, B is a principal ideal Sa, and a must divide all the elements g(z)−zg(z) - z (z∈Sz \in S); now, for z∈Vz \in V, these elements are homogeneous of degree 1 and are all non-zero (since g≠1g \neq 1); thus, a must be homogeneous of degree 1, in other words a∈Va \in V. Then there exists a linear form f on V such that g=sa,fg = s_{a,f}. Conversely, if g is a pseudo-reflection sa,fs_{a,f} different from 1, then g(z)≡z(modSa)g(z) \equiv z \pmod{Sa} for all z∈Sz \in S, so g belongs to the inertia group of the prime ideal B=SaB = Sa. This proves the first assertion of the lemma and the characterizations of GZ(B)G^Z(B) and GT(B)G^T(B). Since q is coprime to the characteristic p of K (which is also that of S(B)), the extension S(B) of R(p)R(p) is separable (Commutative Algebra, Chap. V, § 2, no. 2, Cor. of Prop. 5). The equality e(B/p)=Card⁡(Ha)e(B/p) = \operatorname{Card}(H_a) follows from this (Commutative Algebra). Since e(B/p)e(B/p) is coprime to p, the coefficient of B in div⁡(DS/R)\operatorname{div}(D_{S/R}) is e(B/p)−1e(B/p) - 1 (Commutative Algebra). This proves the lemma.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • Commutative Algebra, Chap. V, § 2, no. 2, Cor. of Prop. 5 not yet on this site: AC V
Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.