Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 0ATJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ATJ].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 6. The Coxeter transformation

Let X be a finite forest, and x↦gxx \mapsto g_x a map from X to a group Γ\Gamma such that gxg_x and gyg_y are conjugate whenever xx and yy are not linked in X. Let T\mathscr{T} be the set of total orderings on X. For all ξ∈T\xi \in \mathscr{T}, let pξp_\xi be the product in Γ\Gamma of the sequence (gx)x∈X(g_x)_{x \in X} defined by ξ\xi. Then the elements pξp_\xi are conjugate in Γ\Gamma.

1) We proceed by induction on n=Card Xn = \mathrm{Card}\, X. The case n=1n = 1 is immediate, so assume that n⩾2n \geqslant 2. There exists in XX a terminal vertex aa (Chap. IV, Appendix, no. 3, Prop. 2). Let b∈X−{a}b \in X - \{a\} be a vertex linked to aa if one exists; if aa is not linked to any vertex in X−{a}X - \{a\}, let bb in X−{a}X - \{a\} be arbitrary. In all cases, gag_a commutes with gxg_x for x≠bx \neq b. Let η∈T\eta \in \mathscr{T} be such that aa is the largest element of XX and bb the largest element of X−{a}X - \{a\}; we let ξ∈T\xi \in \mathscr{T} and prove that pξ,pηp_{\xi}, p_{\eta} are conjugate.

2) Assume first that, for ξ\xi, aa is the largest element of XX and bb the largest element of X−{a}X - \{a\}. Let X′X' be the full subgraph X−{a}X - \{a\}, which is a forest. Define a map x↦gx′x \mapsto g'_x from X′X' to Γ\Gamma by putting gx′=gxg'_x = g_x if x≠bx \neq b, gb′=gbgag'_b = g_bg_a. Let ξ′,η′\xi', \eta' be the restrictions of ξ,η\xi, \eta to X′X'. The induction hypothesis applies, so pξ′p_{\xi'} and pη′p_{\eta'} are conjugate. But it is clear that pξ′=pξ,pη′=pηp_{\xi'} = p_{\xi}, p_{\eta'} = p_{\eta}, proving the lemma in this case.

3) Assume that aa is the largest element of XX for ξ\xi. Let X1X_1 (resp. X2X_2) be the set of elements of X−{a}X - \{a\} strictly larger (resp. smaller) than bb; let ξi\xi_i be the restriction of ξ\xi to XiX_i. Then

pξ=pξ1gbpξ2ga=pξ1gbgapξ2, p_{\xi} = p_{\xi_1} g_b p_{\xi_2} g_a = p_{\xi_1} g_b g_a p_{\xi_2},

and this element is conjugate to pξ2pξ1gbgap_{\xi_2} p_{\xi_1} g_b g_a. We are thus reduced to case 2).

4) In the general case, let X3X_3 (resp. X4X_4) be the set of elements of XX strictly larger (resp. smaller) than aa; let ξi\xi_i be the restriction of ξ\xi to XiX_i. Then pξ=pξ3gapξ4p_{\xi} = p_{\xi_3} g_a p_{\xi_4}, and this element is conjugate to pξ4pξ3gap_{\xi_4} p_{\xi_3} g_a. We are thus reduced to case 3).

It follows from Prop. 1 that all the Coxeter transformations are of the same order h=h(W)h = h(W). This number is called the Coxeter number of WW.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.