Bourbaki

Proposition 28

Tag 0AW3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AW3].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VI, § 1. Root systems

Let BB be a basis of RR, B′B' a subset of BB, V′V' the vector subspace of VV generated by B′B', R′=R∩V′R' = R \cap V' (which is a root system in V′V'*),* R′~R'\tilde{} the inverse root system (which is identified with the canonical image of R′R' in R′~R'\tilde{}), V1V_1 the orthogonal complement of R′~R'\tilde{} in VV, and pp the projection of VV onto V′V' parallel to V1V_1. Then, Q(R′)=Q(R)∩V′Q(R') = Q(R) \cap V', P(R′)=p(P(R))P(R') = p(P(R)). The set of dominant weights of R′R' is the image under pp of the set of dominant weights of RR.

Indeed, Q(R)Q(R) is the subgroup of VV with basis BB, Q(R′)Q(R') is the subgroup of V′V' with basis B′B' (no. 7, Cor. 4 of Prop. 20) from which Q(R′)=Q(R)∩V′Q(R') = Q(R) \cap V' is immediate. If ω‾∈P(R)\overline{\omega} \in P(R) and α∈R′\alpha \in R', ⟨p(ω‾),α∨⟩=⟨ω‾,α∨⟩∈Z\langle p(\overline{\omega}), \alpha^\vee \rangle = \langle \overline{\omega}, \alpha^\vee \rangle \in \mathbf{Z}, so p(ω‾)∈P(R′)p(\overline{\omega}) \in P(R'), and hence p(P(R))⊆P(R′)p(P(R)) \subseteq P(R'). If ω‾′∈P(R′)\overline{\omega}' \in P(R'), ω‾′\overline{\omega}' extends to a linear form ω‾\overline{\omega} on V∗V^* vanishing on (B−B′)~(B - B')\tilde{}; we have ⟨ω‾,α∨⟩∈Z\langle \overline{\omega}, \alpha^\vee \rangle \in \mathbf{Z} for all α∈B\alpha \in B, so ω‾∈P(R)\overline{\omega} \in P(R), and ω‾′=p(ω‾)\overline{\omega}' = p(\overline{\omega}); hence P(R′)⊆p(P(R))P(R') \subseteq p(P(R)). Thus P(R′)=p(P(R))P(R') = p(P(R)), and the assertion about dominant weights is proved in the same way.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.