Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 0B0Q, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0B0Q].

General Topology, chapter I, § 2. Continuous functions

Let XX be a set, (Xλ)λ∈L(X_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} a family of subsets of XX. Suppose each XλX_\lambda carries a topology Tλ\mathfrak{T}_\lambda such that, for each pair of indices (λ,μ)(\lambda, \mu): 1) Xλ∩XμX_\lambda \cap X_\mu is open (resp. closed) in each of the topologies Tλ,Tμ\mathfrak{T}_\lambda, \mathfrak{T}_\mu. 2) The topologies induced on Xλ∩XμX_\lambda \cap X_\mu by Tλ\mathfrak{T}_\lambda and Tμ\mathfrak{T}_\mu coincide. Let T\mathfrak{T} be the finest topology on XX for which the injections jλ:Xλ→Xj_\lambda : X_\lambda \to X are continuous. Then, for each λ∈L\lambda \in L, XλX_\lambda is open (resp. closed) in XX in the topology T\mathfrak{T}, and the topology induced by T\mathfrak{T} on XλX_\lambda coincides with Tλ\mathfrak{T}_\lambda.

In view of Proposition 6 and its corollary, it is enough to show that for each λ\lambda and each subset AλA_\lambda of XλX_\lambda the following statements are equivalent: (i) AλA_\lambda is open (resp. closed) in the topology Tλ\mathfrak{T}_\lambda. (ii) For each μ∈L\mu \in L, Aλ∩XμA_\lambda \cap X_\mu is open (resp. closed) in the topology Tμ\mathfrak{T}_\mu.

It is clear that (ii) implies (i) by taking μ=λ\mu = \lambda. Conversely, if (i) is satisfied, then Aλ∩XμA_\lambda \cap X_\mu is open (resp. closed) in Xλ∩XμX_\lambda \cap X_\mu for the topology Tλμ\mathfrak{T}_{\lambda \mu} induced on Xλ∩XμX_{\lambda} \cap X_{\mu} by Tλ\mathfrak{T}_{\lambda}; but Tλμ\mathfrak{T}_{\lambda \mu} is also the topology induced on Xλ∩XμX_{\lambda} \cap X_{\mu} by Tμ\mathfrak{T}_{\mu}; hence Aλ∩XμA_{\lambda} \cap X_{\mu} is also the intersection of Xλ∩XμX_{\lambda} \cap X_{\mu} with a subset BμB_{\mu} of XμX_{\mu} which is open (resp. closed) in the topology Tμ\mathfrak{T}_{\mu}; since Xλ∩XμX_{\lambda} \cap X_{\mu} is open (resp. closed) in Tμ\mathfrak{T}_{\mu}, so is Aλ∩XμA_{\lambda} \cap X_{\mu}. This completes the proof.

We remark that if the union of the XλX_{\lambda} is different from XX, then the topology induced by T\mathfrak{T} on X−(⋃λ∈LXλ)X - \left( \bigcup_{\lambda \in L} X_{\lambda} \right) is discrete. For if x∈Xx \in X belongs to none of the XλX_{\lambda}, then {x}∩Xλ=∅\{ x \} \cap X_{\lambda} = \varnothing is open in each topology Tλ\mathfrak{T}_{\lambda} and therefore {x}\{ x \} is open in the topology T\mathfrak{T}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.