Definition 2
Tag 0BD2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BD2].
General Topology, chapter II, § 1. Uniform spaces
A fundamental system of entourages of a uniformity is any set of entourages such that every entourage contains a set belonging to .
Axiom (U_{III}) shows that if is any integer and runs through a fundamental system of entourages, then the sets again form a fundamental system of entourages.
Entourages such that are called symmetric. If is any entourage, then and are symmetric entourages, and axioms (F_{II}) and (U_{II}) show that the symmetric entourages form a fundamental system of entourages.
A set of subsets of is a fundamental system of entourages of a uniformity on if and only if satisfies axiom (B_I) of Chapter I, § 6, no. 3, and also satisfies the following axioms:
(U'_I) Every set of contains the diagonal .
(U'_II) For each there exists such that .
(U'_III) For each there exists such that .
If is not empty, a fundamental system of entourages of a uniform structure on is a base of the filter formed by the entourages of this structure (Chapter I, § 6, no. 3, Proposition 3).
(*) We recall (Set Theory, R, § 3, nos. 4 and 10) that if and are two subsets of , then the set of pairs , such that and for some , is denoted by or , and that the set of pairs such that is denoted by .
Examples of uniformities. \* 1) On the set of real numbers we can define a uniformity, called the additive uniformity, as follows: for each let be the subset of consisting of all pairs such that ; as runs through the set of all real numbers , the form a fundamental system of entourages for the additive uniformity on . Similarly we can define a uniformity (again called the additive uniformity) on the set of rational numbers; we shall study these structures, and analogous uniform structures on groups, in Chapters III and IV. \* 2) Let be a set and let be an equivalence relation on ; let be the graph of in . Then and ; (Set Theory, R, § 5, no. 1); the set of subsets of which consists of the set alone is therefore a fundamental system of entourages of a uniformity on . In particular, if we take to be the relation of equality, then and the entourages of the corresponding uniformity are all the subsets of which contain ; this uniformity is called the discrete uniformity on , and the set endowed with this uniformity is called a discrete uniform space. 3) On the set of rational integers we can define a uniformity, important in the theory of numbers, as follows: given a prime number , let be the set of all pairs such that , for each integer . It is easily verified that the sets (for a fixed ) form a fundamental system of entourages of a uniformity on , called the -adic uniformity (cf. Chapter III, § 6, Exercises 23 ff., and Chapter IX, § 3, no. 2).
In accordance with the general definitions (Set Theory, R, § 8, no. 5), if and are two sets each endowed with uniformities whose sets of entourages are and respectively, then a bijection of onto is an isomorphism of the uniformity of onto that of if , where .
For example, if and are two equipotent sets, then every bijection of onto is an isomorphism of the discrete uniformity of onto the discrete uniformity of .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.