Bourbaki

Example 1

Tag 0BER, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BER].

General Topology, chapter II, § 3. Complete spaces

Consider the sequence (un)(u_n) on the rational line Q\mathbf{Q} defined by un=∑p=0n2−p(p+1)/2u_n = \sum_{p=0}^n 2^{-p(p+1)/2}. If m>nm > n we have

∣um−un∣≤2−n(n+3)/2 |u_m - u_n| \leq 2^{-n(n+3)/2}
and therefore (un)(u_n) is a Cauchy sequence. But this sequence has no limit in Q\mathbf{Q}; for if the rational number a/ba/b were a limit of (un)(u_n), then by (1) we should have for all nn
∣a/b−hn/2n(n+1)/2∣≤1/2n(n+3)/2 |a/b - h_n/2^{n(n+1)/2}| \leq 1/2^{n(n+3)/2}
where hnh_n is an integer (depending on nn); that is,
∣a⋅2n(n+1)/2−bhn∣≤b⋅2−n |a \cdot 2^{n(n+1)/2} - b h_n| \leq b \cdot 2^{-n}
for all nn. Now the left-hand side of this inequality is an integer for all nn, and must therefore be zero whenever nn is greater than an integer n0n_0 such that b<2n0b < 2^{n_0}; we should therefore have a/b=una/b = u_n for all n>n0n > n_0, which is absurd.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.