Bourbaki

Proposition 16

Tag 0BFI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BFI].

General Topology, chapter II, § 3. Complete spaces

Let XX be a uniform space and ii the canonical mapping of XX into its Hausdorff completion X^\hat{X}. For each uniformly continuous mapping ff of XX into a Hausdorff uniform space YY, there is a unique uniformly continuous mapping h:i(X)→Yh : i(X) \to Y such that f=h∘if = h \circ i.

We may identify YY with a subspace of its completion Y^\hat{Y} (no. 7, Corollary to Proposition 12), and ff can then be considered as a uniformly continuous mapping of XX into Y^\hat{Y}. By virtue of Theorem 3, ff is then of the form f=g∘if = g \circ i, where gg is a uniformly continuous mapping of X^\hat{X} into Y^\hat{Y}. If hh is the restriction of gg to i(X)i(X), then clearly f=h∘if = h \circ i, and hh maps i(X)i(X) into YY. The uniqueness of hh is trivial.

The pair (i,i(X))(i, i(X)) is therefore the solution of a universal mapping problem (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 3, no. 1), where this time we take the Σ\Sigma-sets to be Hausdorff uniform spaces, and the σ\sigma-morphisms (resp. α\alpha-mappings) to be uniformly continuous mappings (resp. uniformly continuous mappings of XX into a Hausdorff uniform space).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.