Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 0BFM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BFM].

General Topology, chapter II, § 3. Complete spaces

Let RR be the equivalence relation i(x)=i(x′)i(x) = i(x') on XX. We have seen (no. 7, Proposition 12) that the graph CC of RR is the intersection of all the entourages of XX. It is clear that every open set (and therefore also every closed set) in XX is saturated with respect to RR; taking account of the definition of the inverse image of a topology, we conclude that the canonical bijection of the quotient space X/RX/R onto i(X)i(X) induced by ii is a homeomorphism. The Hausdorff space associated with XX can therefore be identified, qua topological space, with X/RX/R. The canonical mapping i:X→i(X)i : X \to i(X) is open and closed, and even proper (Chapter I, §10§ 10, no. 2, Example).

Let X′X' be another uniform space, C′C' the intersection of all the entourages of X′X', and R′R' the equivalence relation whose graph is C′C'. Let f:X→X′f : X \to X' be a continuous mapping. Since the inverse image under ff of any neighbourhood of f(x)f(x) is a neighbourhood of xx, it follows that the inverse image under ff of C′(f(x))C'(f(x)) contains C(x)C(x), and therefore ff is compatible with RR and R′R', and induces a continuous mapping X/R→X′/R′X/R \to X'/R' (Chapter I, §3§ 3, no. 4, Corollary to Proposition 6). This generalizes the corollary to Proposition 16.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.